NB
Commentary: Is it Real Or Is It Memorex?
You just
gotta wonder what all the saber rattling is really all about. Is it about
peace? Is it about war? Is it about oil? is it about Israeli Secret
Intelligence Service? Is it about Islam? Ironically, they want to have stronger gun laws in Western countries while selling high power weaponry and armored vehicles to the so-called moderate rebels who are trying to overthrow their government by any means necessary and they ain't peaceful means, by the way!
Think about that, what would be the US response if, say, Russia sold guns, munitions and armored trucks etc., to the anarchist enclave in the US, or maybe to the New Black Panther Party, or how about a few men who support the Bundy Ranch empire. Heck, sell some guns to the MOORS, or the Sovereignty movement. I quiver to think of the consequence of that kind of meddling in our movements on the ground against a corrupt government!
Then again, when there is buying, isn't there some selling going on? So where are these rebels getting the money to purchase these munitions? Or is the US and the other 40 countries that are arming the so-called moderates, giving their millions of dollars in munitions away to these sorry fools who get a kick out of pretend cutting off heads while the other drugged up compatriots kill, rape women and children. Now how moderate is that? This is starting to sound like a big fat trumped up hoax to sell more weapons and kill and displace a few hundred thousand in the process.
One
thing that is for certain, it has definitely fit into the depopulation agenda of
the elite. Why not just get folks fighting each other and that will save us. We
will have more space to stretch out and since we will have robotics to take
care of our every whim, we won't need humans at all after a while.
Maybe
they are planning to come back like an Egyptian Pharaoh, and reap the benefits
of today's spoils, for surely it will not happen in their lifetime.
Or maybe
they are trying to speed it up so it CAN happen in their life time.
Whatever
the case may be, the carnage and destruction is not a pretty picture at all,
and somebody needs to rewind the tape back to before Eve gave the apple to
Adam.
The Pretend War: Why Bombing Isil Won't Solve The Problem
The
deployment of our military might in Syria will exacerbate regional disorder –
and it will solve nothing
By Andrew J. Bacevich
Nov. 28, 2015
Not so
long ago, David Cameron declared that he was not some ‘naive neocon who thinks
you can drop democracy out of an aeroplane at 40,000 feet’. Just a few weeks
after making that speech, Cameron authorised UK forces to join in the bombing
of Libya — where the outcome reaffirmed this essential lesson.
Soon
Cameron will ask parliament to share his ‘firm conviction’ that bombing Raqqa,
the Syrian headquarters of the Islamic State, has become ‘imperative’. At first
glance, the case for doing so appears compelling. The atrocities in Paris
certainly warrant a response. With François Hollande having declared his
intention to ‘lead a war which will be pitiless’, other western nations can
hardly sit on their hands; as with 9/11 and 7/7, the moment calls for
solidarity. And since the RAF is already targeting Isis in Iraq, why not extend
the operation to the other side of the elided border? What could be easier?
But it’s
harder to establish what expanding the existing bombing campaign further will
actually accomplish. Is Britain engaged in what deserves to be called a war, a
term that implies politically purposeful military action? Or is the Cameron
government — and the Hollande government as well — merely venting its anger,
and thereby concealing the absence of clear-eyed political purpose?
Britain
and France each once claimed a place among the world’s great military powers.
Whether either nation today retains the will (or the capacity) to undertake a
‘pitiless’ war — presumably suggesting a decisive outcome at the far end — is
doubtful. The greater risk is that, by confusing war with punishment, they
exacerbate the regional disorder to which previous western military
interventions have contributed.
Even
without Britain doing its bit, plenty of others are willing to drop bombs on
Isis on either side of the Iraq-Syria frontier. With token assistance from
Bahrain, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey, US forces have thus far flown some
57,000 sorties while completing 8,300 air strikes. United States Central
Command keeps a running scorecard: 129 Isis tanks destroyed, 670 staging areas
and 5,000 fighting positions plastered, and (in a newish development) 260 oil
infrastructure facilities struck, with the numbers updated from one day to the
next. The campaign that the Americans call Operation Inherent Resolve has been
under way now for 17 months. It seems unlikely to end anytime soon.
In
Westminster or the Elysée, the Pentagon’s carefully tabulated statistics are
unlikely to garner much official attention, and for good reason. All these
numbers make a rather depressing point: with plenty of sorties flown, munitions
expended and targets hit, the results achieved, even when supplemented with
commando raids, training missions and the generous distribution of arms to
local forces, amount in sum to little more than military piddling. In the
United States, the evident ineffectiveness of the air campaign has triggered
calls for outright invasion. Pundits of a bellicose stripe, most of whom got
the Iraq war of 2003 wrong, insist that a mere 10,000 or 20,000 ground troops —
50,000 tops! — will make short work of the Islamic State as a fighting force.
Victory guaranteed.
Fake Video Footage: The West’s Propaganda War on Syria Exposed Once Again
Indeed, the video was a complete hoax – a literal production filmed in Malta, not Syria, and consisting of actors, actresses, and special effects. The UK Mirror in its article, “Footage of Syrian ‘hero boy’ dodging sniper’s bullets to save girl revealed as FAKE,” would finally admit:
Lars Klevberg, 34, from Oslo, devised the hoax after watching news coverage of the troubles in Syria.
He told BBC Trending: “If I could make a film and pretend it was real, people would share it and react with hope.
“We shot it in Malta in May this year on a set that was used for other famous movies like Troy and Gladiator.
“The little boy and girl are professional actors from Malta. The voices in the background are Syrian refugees living in Malta.”
Not the First Time
Source
No
sweat.
And who
knows? Notwithstanding their record of dubious military prognostications, the
proponents of invade-and-occupy just might be right — in the short term. The
West can evict Isis from Raqqa if it really wants to. But as we have seen in
other recent conflicts, the real problems are likely to present themselves the
day after victory. What then? Once in, how will we get out? Competition rather
than collaboration describes relations between many of the countries opposing
Isis. As Barack Obama pointed out this week, there are now two coalitions
converging over Syria: a US-led one, and a Russia-led one that includes Iran.
Looking for complications? With Turkey this week having shot down a Russian
fighter jet — the first time a Nato member has downed a Kremlin military
aircraft for half a century — the subsequent war of words between Turkey’s
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Vladimir Putin gives the world a glimpse
into how all this could spin out of control.
The threat posed by terrorism is merely symptomatic of larger underlying problems. Crush Isis, whether by bombing or employing boots on the ground, and those problems will still persist. A new Isis, under a different name but probably flying the same banner, will appear in its place, much as Isis itself emerged from the ashes of al-Qaeda in Iraq..............
The threat posed by terrorism is merely symptomatic of larger underlying problems. Crush Isis, whether by bombing or employing boots on the ground, and those problems will still persist. A new Isis, under a different name but probably flying the same banner, will appear in its place, much as Isis itself emerged from the ashes of al-Qaeda in Iraq..............
Read More click here
Andrew J. Bacevich is a retired US colonel, and
author of America’s War for the Greater Middle East: A Military
History, due out in April.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. Peace, NB