Newtown school shooting story already being changed by the media to eliminate eyewitness reports of a second shooter
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the
tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have
reportedly been killed, including 18 children.
As always, when
violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the
question: "Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?"
One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman,
indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often
mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora "Batman" shooter James Holmes,
for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control
technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical
mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizona in 2011.
According
to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at
least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado,
James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter
involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second
shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a
"lone gunman."
Today, the exact same thing is happening with the Newton, CT school shooting.
Eyewitness reports of a second shooter now being "scrubbed" from the news
As the story of this shooting was first breaking, the news was reporting a second gunman.
FoxNews reported
that this second gunman was "led out of the woods by officers" and then
questioned. The original source of this report was the Connecticut
Post.
A local CBS affiliate
was also reporting the existence of a second gunman and said "Police
believe there may be a second gunman and are looking for a red or maroon
van with its back window blown out..."
A local CT CBS affiliate
was also reporting, "CBS News reports that a potential second shooter
is in custody and that SWAT is now investigating the home of the
suspect. A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the
woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and
telling parents on the scene, 'I did not do it.'"
But the more
recent stories being put out by the media are scrubbing any mention of a
second gunman and going with the "lone gunman" explanation, which holds
about as much water as the "lone gunman" explanation of the JFK
assassination.
"A lone gunman killed 27 people at an elementary
school here, including 18 children, in a terrifying early Friday morning
shooting spree," reports USA Today. It makes no mention whatsoever of a second gunman.
NBC News
is also now chiming in with the "lone gunman" version of the story,
eliminating any mention of a second gunman from its coverage of the
tragic event.
Another story authored by NBC News
carries the title, "26 dead after lone gunman assaults Connecticut
elementary school." Once again, no mention of a second gunman as
reported by eyewitnesses.
When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy
Journalists
are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now
is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage
after the first few hours of this story developing?
And why is
there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to
be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror
of all the innocent deaths?
This story is continuing to develop, and we'll keep asking questions here on Natural News.
Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by
this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken
place here, shouldn't we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these
shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled
shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?
For
the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the
bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping
this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future.
My long-distance interest in the Sandy Hook events is based on ongoing work with a team of anti-pedophile journalists and activists who for over a decade have tracked and exposed American pedophile rings from Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam) to Beijing, China.
In all cases so far, our team discovered that these frontline pedophiles supply children for sexual services to VIPs traveling in Asia, including diplomats from the highest levels of the White House and State Department, top executives of major corporations, and heads of universities and aid agencies. Nearly all the patrons involved in this cruel pastime have backgrounds in US intelligence the CIA, NSA or State Department intelligence. The individuals are from diverse religious backgrounds Catholic, Jewish and Orthodox - while the core facilitators are often priests with Jesuit order, and to a lesser degree Franciscans and Benedictines.
At an orphanage in Cambodia, it took three years for our multinational team against death threats from armed policemen and undisguised hostility from NGOs to realize the expulsion of a pedophile coven, which included a former US ambassador to the United Nations, the celebrated head of a new media program at an Ivy League campus and a renowned correspondent based at the Tokyo American Club. When the police shut down their strong-encryption computer center and satellite uplink, used for sweetheart messaging and exporting child-porn videos, the American pedophiles stripped out all the programs, rendering a room of Apple computers inoperable. Later, at a celebration for the “liberation” of the orphans from the grip of these abusive men and their compliant wives, the teachers told me that the average age of the boys and girls who had been invited to sleep over at weekend parties was “10 years old.”
One member of our team who resided in Cambodia suffered an “accident” in a cowardly act of retaliation by that viscous coven with all the fingers on both hands broken and bleeding from his ears as he lay unconscious along a highway. It’s taken our brave friend three years to regain his formidable intellectual powers as a former political speechwriter. I use the term “coven” because these predators work as families parents, children and grandchildren indoctrinated from infancy that inflicting trauma on helpless children is life's greatest pleasure.
Pedophilia is a psychiatric illness that is spreading worldwide because the globalist elite, much like a deranged fraternity from hazing hell, use it to control their peers and underlings through the commission of shameful and often lethal crimes. The photos are enough to prevent defection, informing to the police or sending leaks to the media.
The American power elite’s predilection for young boys has always been a privilege as shown in past scandals involving White House pages. One of the first postwar American ambassadors to Tokyo was a voracious pursuer of teenage boys inside gay bath houses frequented by rightwing Japanese militarists, the very same war criminals who had committed unspeakable atrocities against civilians for example converting Christian boys schools into male brothels. The shared lust of the former soldiers from both sides corrupted and ultimately reversed the attempt by a victorious Allied Supreme Command to transform Japan into a peaceful democracy. Authoritarian perversion remains in command.
In recent years with the rise of Internet file-sharing, a major shift in pedophile profiles has appeared in the increasingly lower age of pedophiles. It is shocking that college-age men, who should be involved in same-age affairs (with either sex we are not being judgmental about preference) are instead eager to abduct kids who are barely out of infancy and videotape brutal rape scenes to share with their online fellows. Today, young men of college age serve as procurers, pimps and producers of child porn for their sugar daddies.
These younger pedophiles, at least while in Asia, are often studying abroad on US government fellowships, CIA grants or working for Soros-funded NGOs. In Beijing, I had a verbal sparring match with a young American video producer who was making a documentary on child abductions by Chinese adoption rings. He had no intention of saving kids from these criminals, since his stated ambition was to launch a pornography industry in China. This was the son of a leading faculty member at a Connecticut prep school, which sponsors troubled boys and prepares them for a life of male prostitution with dormitory screenings of videos showing the gang rape of preteen girls with the knowledge and sometimes approval of teachers, according to testimony submitted to court.
After first being a victim of sexual assault and then acting as a perpetrator against younger boys or girls, many of these young men develop passive-aggressive personalities. When challenged, they tend react with suppressed rage under a blank expression and then get their revenge with a strange prank against their accusers.
Many women might nod in agreement that men are awful creatures, but from our experience in Southeast Asia, there are also many female predators. On an early-morning visit to a Peace Corps camp on the Laotian border, a friend in the U.S. Army was stunned to discover that every American women all graduates of elite East Coast colleges was asleep with a 12-to-14 girl tucked inside her bed. Americans are not alone in this sickness of mind and body Europeans, Australians and Japanese are among the notorious child molesters. Sexual domination of weaker individuals, especially children who cannot defend their rights, is a hallmark of imperialism.
There is one more element involved in the pedophile industry: the organized crime groups that finance the purchase or kidnapping of children. These gangsters are not just low-life elements but also include professional gangsters - “businessmen” with connections to politicians and bankers.
A point that needs mentioning is that during youth, I spent a summer at a prep school in Connecticut on a National Science Foundation program but it had nothing to do with MK-ULTRA.
Mind Control in Connecticut: Catcher in the Rye
In 1942, at the start of World War II, the Jesuit order opened Fairfield University in southern Connecticut. The new Catholic college was erected on the country estate of Brewster Jennings, then chairman of the Socony Mobil Oil Company, which after a series of mergers became ExxonMobil. After serving as a naval officer in World War I, the Hartford-born oil executive graduated from Yale and became closely associated with the OSS and CIA. He founded the Avalon Foundation, since renamed the Mellon Foundation, which has funded pacification programs inside American society. (Outed spy Valerie Plame worked under cover at the Brewster Jennings “brass plate” company, which acted as the CIA’s counter-proliferation department.) Although the information remains classified, it had to be OSS chief Bill Donovan who prompted the formation of Fairfield University as an intelligence training center for potential CIA recruits vetted from the elite preparatory schools in Connecticut.
During the war in Europe, a non-commissioned office of Russian Jewish descent assigned to U.S. Defense Intelligence worked on Operation Paperclip (the transport of Nazi scientists to U.S. laboratories) and Project Artichoke (smuggling German Jews into Palestine in support of a Zionist state). His name was J.D. “Jerry” Salinger. Later, he served in the Counter-Intelligence Corps, debriefing and reassigning Nazi officers, including those who had conducted psychiatric experiments on prisoners of war.
At war’s end, Salinger lived in Tarrytown, New York, but was soon ordered to move across the state border to Stamford, Connecticut, close to Fairfield University. He resided in a converted barn, out of public view, presumably to continue his special area of intelligence work, the field testing of the MK-ULTRA methods refined by the sadistically clinical Dr. Sidney Gottlieb (the pseudonym of Joseph Schieder), who ran the main mind-control lab at Jesuit-run Georgetown University in Washington, D.C., which is also a finishing school for diplomats in the State Department.
In the Connecticut countryside during his “lost years”, Salinger penned “The Catcher in the Rye”, which contains the command code-words for MK-ULTRA assassins. The protagonist Holden Caulfield is a study of a paranoiac passive-aggressive character, whose favorite expression is: “You’re killing me.”
CIA Partners with Organized Crime in New England
Around 1950, while Salinger was in Stamford, the CIA recruited a South Boston convict nicknamed “Whitey” Bulger to supply young runaways for mind-control experiments under the fast-expanding MK-ULTRA programs being set up at 44 universities across the United States. The centers for the New England drug experiments were probably the Whiting Forensic Facility at the Connecticut Valley Hospital in Middleford, Connecticut, and Bridgewater Hospital in Massachusetts, the region’s psychiatric facilities for the criminally insane.
With CIA backing, Bulger built up his Winter Hill Gang, composed mainly of Irishmen, who strong-armed their way to control over the Boston’s gambling scene and drug trafficking. While little is known about the political activities of the Bulger gang, its rise to crime dominance coincided with the expansion of weapons smuggling into Northern Ireland in support of the IRA. A parallel cross-Atlantic traffic in drugs (and illegal immigration in the reverse direction) began at the same time. The predominantly Irish political machine of Boston from the Prohibition Era smuggling tycoon Joseph Kennedy Sr, to House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill gave their blessings to the flourishing organized crime network and voiced support for the patriotic IRA “freedom fighters,” who returned the favor to Washington with murderous attacks on American-loathing British figures such as Lord Montbatten.
Connecticut, under control of the Patriciarca crime family, was off-limits to Bulger. The day-to-day operations of the Sicilian immigrants were run by Bill Grasso, head of the clan that later produced Connecticut’s first female governor.
Starting in the 1980s, the DOJ, FBI and CIA launched an all-out war against the Patriciarca mob in order to install their puppet Whitey Bulger as crime boss of New England. FBI agent John Connelly took credit for infiltrating and busting up the Patriarca clan, but later he was exposed as a mole for Bulger. By the early 1990s, Bulger set up his Jai Alai Associates, a betting syndicate based in Connecticut and Florida. Finally, all of New England was safe for CIA smuggling, support for terrorism, money-laundering and mind-control operations.
Whitey Bulger
In 2011, Bulger made headlines with his arrest in Malibu, California, where he had lived for more than a decade “undetected” despite being on the FBI “most wanted” list - on a long vacation thanks to his relationship with the CIA. If there was one point of irritation, however, between the Irish mobster and his controllers, it was his opposition to drug use by teenagers. After seeing first-hand how MK-ULTRA had destroyed the minds of his young recruits, Bulger ordered his gang members never to sell drugs to teenagers. Even a ruthless mobster has more decency that the self-styled “patriots” who run the intelligence services.
Whatever its genteel image of colonial homes and autumnal foliage, Connecticut has a sleazy underside embedded in its servant pool, welfare households and the chronic unemployed. Bridgeport, with its low-income Puerto Rican population, is a major center for prostitution and recruitment of prostitutes for VIP clients in New York and the nation’s capital.
The pedophile rings have a social-economic hierarchy at the top are the VIP clients, then the intermediaries, often Catholic priests or social-services managers, further down the ladder the operatives losers recruited from prep schools and college campuses - and finally the supply itself - money-hungry willing parents and the unwillingly abducted children.
Newtown, like Fairfield and Stamford, is part of the Diocese of Bridgeport, which got into legal trouble in 2001 due to lawsuits by 23 victims of pedophilia committed by priests. Bishop Edward Egan, then diocese head, was a protector of sexual offender priests, sending them to other areas when parental complaints reached the ears of the police. After the plaintiffs won an out-of-court settlement, the Diocese petitioned the US Supreme Court to quash the thousands of documents detailing the beastly sex crimes. In 2009 Opus Dei honcho Justice Antonin Scalia determined that the court records should not be made public.
In this past year’s pedophile scandal at Penn State, another Opus Dei leader, former FBI director Louis Freeh, was hired as a consultant by the Nittany Lions football team. His whitewash report put most of the blame on head coach Joe Paterno, while suppressing the names and backgrounds of the wealthy and powerful boosters who were provided sexual services from the young football players.
In Connecticut, the Vatican had an interest in wiping the slate clean, and so did the CIA. The clean slate turned out to be a bloody mess.
Agency-Spawned Pedophiles
The MK-ULTRA program that reached into campuses across Connecticut quickly created a human garbage heap of wrecked minds and twisted souls. The child abuse and drugs routinely administered to young trainees led to a permanent social fixture of sadism and sexual abuse throughout New England from the gutter up to the governing class.
In 2011, a Newtown resident named Edwin Wilson was arrested for having a months-long sexual relationship with a 4-year-old girl and producing child-porn videos of their sexual encounters. The arrest was a part of a wide crackdown order the state attorney general, Richard Blumenthal which boosted his successful campaign in the U.S. Senate race. Other cases included: a 24-year-old Hispanic male in Hartford who shot videos of sex with a pre-teen girl; a DJ in Plainfield arraigned on similar charges, an older theater and film teacher accused of using Taft school’s equipment to make kiddie porn the list goes on in sickening detail. Fairfield University, where MK-ULTRA was implanted into New England, recently saw two staffers implicated in the rape of 23 Haitian boys during the earthquake relief effort.
Adam Lanza fits the profile of a pedophile-ring recruit young enough to approach children at the local schools and in the churches, possessing the computer skills to produce child-porn videos and typically passive-aggressive in personality. The Lanzas attended the Saint Rosa of Lima Church, where eight child parishioners were among the shooting victims. Santa Rosa is the very same order that sponsors the western-state hospital that employed Michael Jackson’s physician Dr. Conrad Murray. As in the case of Jackson’s Neverland, after a child-sex experiment blossoms, it must be shut down.
The Lone Gun-Boy Theory
Nancy Lanza kept an arsenal of firearms, and ordered her son to be constantly under watch by older boys. She must have had good reason for being armed to the teeth. Judging from her hoard of rifles and hand guns, she was expecting an all-out assault from a coven of pedophiles, not an attack by a single shooter. The lone gun-boy theory is sheer nonsense her son may have been an accomplice in giving the assailants access to his home but ended up murdered as a patsy.
The coven is larger and more powerful than Mrs. Lanza could ever have imagined. Sexual violation is the key to creating intelligence agents and assassins who are impervious to reason and mercy, lacking any original thoughts or moral qualms. Plus a supply of children is needed in Congress and the White House to entertain the satraps and moguls from Colombian drug lords to Israeli weapons dealers and French money launderers, not to mention America’s own homegrown pervs.
If the culprits had been Adam Lanza and his pals, then their response to grounding would have been something like posting photos and addresses of naked children. The method of the shooting point-blank execution-style gun shots indicate that the assailants were professional hit men, probably allied with the Winter Hill Gang.
The Sandy Hook assault happened probably because of a split between competing institutions and diverging policies. On one hand, the gangland figures who cooperated with CIA mind-control program that promoted child-sex as a means of ensuring obedience and secrecy were being challenged by politicians playing up parental demands to clean up the scandalous child-sex problem in Connecticut.
The dirty FBI agent John Connelly was more of a double agent and go-between for the Feds and not simply a Winter Hill mole as portraying at his sentencing. The arrest of Whitey Bulger was a pure-and-simple double-cross by the FBI and CIA, who had used him as an ally in MK-ULTRA and informant for more than a half-century. In his ambitious drive to win a U.S. senatorial seat, state attorney general and now Senator Blumenthal broke the basic rules of mob cooperation. And now that has led to a war on the streets and in the schools.
Unlike the Sicilian crime families who went down easy, the fighting Irish criminals can be counted on to put up a street battle with the same flair as in the movie “The Gangs of New York.” The gangsters have no shortage of allies in the pimps, drug dealers, pedophiles, punks and deranged freaks who have been caught up in the sudden dragnet. The police are outnumbered and easily outgunned. It’s happened before, as in Fort Apache in the South Bronx. Sandy Hook is just the first installment of a payback. If the Feds push any harder, then Bridgeport and Boston will soon be looking like Belfast during the troubles or Beirut in the bad old days.
Stop Drugging the Kids
The mass media is under pressure to cover up the incident with sympathetic blather instead of a sustained probe. Forensic evidence is being literally buried. America is moving on where to, nobody knows. The politicians and cops are now silent and glum. Relying on arrests and wiretapping, they have forgotten that the fight against crime begins with addressing social justice, economic fairness and education and in some unfortunate cases, psychiatric care.
I am Adam Lanza's Doctor by Rima E Laibow, MD
Was a Senate seat worth the lives of all those children and teachers? Blumenthal, who paints himself as a clone of the erstwhile New York mayor Rudy Giuliani, will have to live with that question for the remainder of his life. Is the CIA satisfied that its mind-control techniques that have created hordes of homicidal monsters from Iraq to Libya and now Connecticut?
Richard Blumenthal
The lesson of Sandy Hook is that mind-control cannot itself be controlled. Programmed killers are like robots without power-off switches. The process of transforming innocent children into robots through sexual abuse is inhumane and a crime. Whatever MK-ULTRA is called today - since we know it still exists after seeing the Abu Ghraib Prison photos - it must be shut down forever or the murderous nightmare will go on and on. And mind-altering drugs are not just for sinister purposes, since at least 60 percent of U.S. children are on a pharmaceutical dosages long before they can learn how to think. Even parents act as mind-controllers against their own kids.
Now, with the investigation terminated, comes the diversionary exercise of “gun control”, a national effort led by Joe Biden, a member of the Knights of Malta, a politician with an intelligence background who is sworn to protect the interests of the Vatican. Say it ain't so, Joe. Leave intact the right of armed self-defense or the gangsters will take over everything, but get rid of the drugs and end the mind control and America will be a safer place, especially for its children.
Yoichi Shimatsu, a science writer based in Hong Kong, provides herbal therapy and health counseling to the victims of the Fukushima radiation crisis.
“[My staff] and I hope the people of Newtown don’t have it crash on their head later.” –Connecticut Medical Examiner D. Wayne Carver II, MD, December 15, 2012
Inconsistencies and anomalies abound when one turns an analytical eye
to news of the Newtown school massacre. The public’s general acceptance
of the event’s validity and faith in its resolution suggests a deepened
credulousness borne from a world where almost all news and information
is electronically mediated and controlled. The condition is reinforced
through the corporate media’s unwillingness to push hard questions
vis-Ã -vis Connecticut and federal authorities who together bottlenecked
information while invoking prior restraint through threats of
prosecutorial action against journalists and the broader citizenry
seeking to interpret the event on social media.
Along these lines on December 19 the Connecticut State Police
assigned individual personnel to each of the 26 families who lost a
loved one at Sandy Hook Elementary. “The families have requested no
press interviews,” State Police assert on their behalf, “and we are
asking that this request be honored.[1] The de facto gag order will be
in effect until the investigation concludes—now forecast to be “several
months away” even though lone gunman Adam Lanza has been confirmed as
the sole culprit.[2]
With the exception of an unusual and apparently contrived appearance
by Emilie Parker’s alleged father, victims’ family members have been
almost wholly absent from public scrutiny.[3] What can be gleaned from
this and similar coverage raises many more questions and glaring
inconsistencies than answers. While it sounds like an outrageous claim,
one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took
place—at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s
news media have described.
The Accidental Medical Examiner
An especially important yet greatly underreported feature of the
Sandy Hook affair is the wholly bizarre performance of Connecticut’s top
medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II at a December 15 press conference.
Carver’s unusual remarks and behavior warrant close consideration
because in light of his professional notoriety they appear remarkably
amateurish and out of character.
H. Wayne Carver II has an extremely self-assured, almost swaggering
presence in Connecticut state administration. In early 2012 Carver
threatened to vacate his position because of state budget cuts and
streamlining measures that threatened his professional autonomy over the
projects and personnel he oversaw.
Along these lines the pathologist has gone to excessive lengths to
demonstrate his findings and expert opinion in court proceedings. For
example, in a famous criminal case Carver “put a euthanized pig through a
wood chipper so jurors could match striations on the bone fragments
with the few ounces of evidence that prosecutors said were on the
remains of the victim.”[4] One would therefore expect Carver to be in
his element while identifying and verifying the exact ways in which
Sandy Hook’s children and teachers met their violent demise.
Yet the H. Wayne Carver who showed up to the December 15 press
conference is an almost entirely different man, appearing apprehensive
and uncertain, as if he is at a significant remove from the postmortem
operation he had overseen. The multiple gaffes, discrepancies, and
hedges in response to reporters’ astute questions suggest that he is
either under coercion or an imposter. While the latter sounds untenable
it would go a long way in explaining his sub-pedestrian grasp of medical
procedures and terminology.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE0OT5od9DA
With this in mind extended excerpts from this exchange are worthy of
recounting here in print. Carver is accompanied by Connecticut State
Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance and additional Connecticut State Police
personnel. The reporters are off-screen and thus unidentified so I have
assigned them simple numerical identification based on what can be
discerned of their voices.
Reporter #1: So the rifle was the primary weapon?
H. Wayne Carver: Yes.
Reporter #1: [Inaudible]
Carver: Uh (pause). Question was what caliber were these bullets. And
I know—I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists but
if I say it in court they yell at me and don’t make me answer [sic]—so
[nervous laughter]. I’ll let the police do that for you.
Reporter #2: Doctor can you tell us about the nature of the wounds.
Were they at very close range? Were the children shot at from across the
room?
Carver: Uhm, I only did seven of the autopsies. The victims I had
ranged from three to eleven wounds apiece and I only saw two of them
with close range shooting. Uh, but that’s, uh y’know, a sample. Uh, I
really don’t have detailed information on the rest of the injuries.
[Given that Carver is Connecticut’s top coroner and in charge of the entire postmortem this is a startling admission.-JT]
Reporter #3: But you said that the long rifle was used?
Carver: Yes.
Reporter #3: But the long rifle was discovered in the car.
State Police Lieutenant Vance: That’s not correct, sir.
Unidentified reporter #4: How many bullets or bullet fragments did you find in the autopsy. Can you tell us that?
Carver: Oh. I’m lucky I can tell you how many I found. I don’t know.
There were lots of them, OK? This type of weapon is not, uh … the
bullets are designed in such a fashion that the energy—this is very
clinical. I shouldn’t be saying this. But the energy is deposited in the
tissue so the bullet stays in [the tissue].
[In fact, the Bushmaster .223 Connecticut police finally claimed was
used in the shooting is designed for long range field use and utilizes
high velocity bullets averaging 3,000 feet-per-second, the energy of
which even at considerable distance would penetrate several bodies
before finally coming to rest in tissue.]
Reporter #5: How close were the injuries?
Carver: Uh, all the ones (pause). I believe say, yes [sic].
Reporter #6: In what shape were the bodies when the families were brought to check [inaudible].
Carver: Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into
contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We
have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is,
uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving
process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it
this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation
depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh,
but uh—
Reporter #7: Do you know the difference of the time of death between
the mother in the house and the bodies recovered [in the school].
Carver: Uh, no, I don’t. Sorry [shakes head excitedly] I don’t! [embarrassed laugh]
Reporter #8: Did the gunman kill himself with the rifle?
Carver: No. I—I don’t know yet. I’ll-I’ll examine him tomorrow morning. But, but I don’t think so.
[Why has Carver left arguably the most important specimen for last?
And why doesn't he think Lanza didn't commit suicide with the rifle?]
Reporter #9: In terms of the children, were they all found in one classroom or—
Carver: Uhm … [inaudible] [Turns to Lieutenant Vance] Paul and company will deal with that.
Reporter #9: What?
Carver: Paul and company will deal with that. Lieutenant Vance is going to handle that one.
Reporter #10: Was there any evidence of a struggle? Any bruises?
Carver: No.
Reporter #11: The nature of the shooting; is there any sense that
there was a lot of care taken with precision [inaudible] or randomly?
Carver: [Exhales while glancing upward, as if frustrated] Both. It’s a
very difficult question to answer … You’d think after thousands of
people I’ve seen shot but I … It’s … If I attempted to answer it in
court there’d be an objection and then they’d win—[nervous laughter].
[Who would win? Why does an expert whose routine job as a public
employee is to provide impartial medical opinion concerned with winning
and losing in court? Further, Carver is not in court but rather at a
press conference.]
Reporter #12: Doctor, can you discuss the fatal injuries to the adults?
Carver: Ah, they were similar to those of the children.
Reporter #13: Doctor, the children you had autopsied, where in the bodies were they hit?
Carver: Uhm [pause]. All over. All over.
Reporter #14: Were [the students] sitting at their desks or were they running away when this happened?
Carver: I’ll let the guys who—the scene guys talk—address that issue.
I, uh, obviously I was at the scene. Obviously I’m very experienced in
that. But there are people who are, uh, the number one professionals in
that. I’ll let them—let that [voice trails off].
Reporter [#15]: How many boys and how many girls [were killed]?
Carver: [Slowly shaking his head] I don’t know.
(Added information from research about the CT Medical Examiner.
More Unanswered Questions and Inconsistencies
In addition to Carver’s remarks several additional chronological and
evidentiary contradictions in the official version of the Sandy Hook
shooting are cause for serious consideration and leave doubt in terms of
how the event transpired vis-Ã -vis the way authorities and major media
outlets have presented it. It is now well known that early on
journalists reported that Adam Lanza’s brother Ryan Lanza was reported
to be the gunman, and that pistols were used in the shooting rather than
a rifle. Yet these are merely the tip of the iceberg.
When Did the Gunman Arrive?
After Adam Lanza fatally shot and killed his mother at his residence,
he drove himself to the elementary school campus, arriving one half
hour after classes had commenced. Dressed in black, Lanza proceeds
completely unnoticed through an oddly vacant parking lot with a military
style rifle and shoots his way through double glass doors and a brand
new yet apparently poorly engineered security system.
Further, initial press accounts suggest how no school personnel or
students heard gunshots and no 911 calls are made until after Lanza
begins firing inside the facility. “It was a lovely day,” Sandy Hook
fourth grade teacher Theodore Varga said. And then, suddenly and
unfathomably, gunshots rang out. “I can’t even remember how many,” Varga
said.[5]
The recollection contrasts sharply with an updated version of Lanza’s arrival where at 9:30AM he
walked up to the front entrance and fired at least a half
dozen rounds into the glass doors. The thunderous sound of Lanza
blowing an opening big enough to walk through the locked school door
caused Principal Dawn Hochsprung and school psychologist Mary Scherlach
to bolt from a nearby meeting room to investigate. He shot and killed
them both as they ran toward him.
Breaching the school’s security system in such a way would have
likely triggered some automatic alert of school personnel. Further, why
would the school’s administrators run toward an armed man who has just
noisily blasted his way into the building?
Two other staff members attending the meeting with Hocksprung and
Scherlach sustained injuries “in the hail of bullets” but returned to
the aforementioned meeting room and managed a call to 911.[6] This
contrasted with earlier reports where the first 911 call claimed
students “were trapped in a classroom with the adult shooter who had two
guns.”[7] Recordings of the first police dispatch following the 911
call at 9:35:50 indicate that someone “thinks there’s someone shooting
in the building.”[8] There is a clear distinction between potentially
hearing shots somewhere in the building and being almost mortally caught
in a “hail of bullets.”
How did the gunman fire so many shots in such little time?
According to Dr. Carver and State Police, Lanza shot each victim
between 3 and 11 times during a 5 to 7 minute span. If one is to average
this out to 7 bullets per individual—excluding misses—Lanza shot 182
times, or once every two seconds. Yet according to the official story
Lanza was the sole assassin and armed with only one weapon. Thus if
misses and changing the gun’s 30-shot magazine at least 6 times are
added to the equation Lanza must have been averaging about one shot per
second—extremely skilled use of a single firearm for a young man with
absolutely no military training and who was on the verge of being
institutionalized. Still, an accurate rendering of the event is even
more difficult to arrive at because the chief medical examiner
admittedly has no idea exactly how the children were shot or whether a
struggle ensued.
Where is the Photo and Video Evidence?
Photographic and video evidence is at once profuse yet lacking in
terms of its capacity to demonstrate that a mass shooting took place on
the scale described by authorities. For example, in an era of ubiquitous
video surveillance of public buildings especially no visual evidence of
Lanza’s violent entry has emerged. And while studio snapshots of the
Sandy Hook victims abound there is little if any eyewitness testimony of
anyone who’s observed the corpses except for Carver and his staff, and
they appear almost as confused about the conditions of the deceased as
any layperson watching televised coverage of the event. Nor are there
any routine eyewitness, photo or video evidence of the crime scene’s
aftermath—broken glass, blasted security locks and doors, bullet casings
and holes, bloodied walls and floors—all of which are common in such
investigations and reportage.
Why Were Medical Personnel Turned Away From the Crime Scene?
Oddly enough medical personnel are forced to set up their operation
not at the school where the dead and injured lay, but rather at the fire
station several hundred feet away. This flies in the face of standard
medical operating procedure where personnel are situated as close to the
scene as possible. There is no doubt that the school had ample room to
accommodate such personnel. Yet medical responders who rushed to Sandy
Hill Elementary upon receiving word of the tragedy were denied entry to
the school and forced to set up primary and secondary triages off school
grounds and wait for the injured to be brought to them.
Shortly after the shooting “as other ambulances from neighboring
communities rolled up, sirens blaring, the first responders slowly
realized that their training would be tragically underutilized on this
horrible day. ‘You may not be able to save everybody, but you damn well
try,’” 44 year old emergency medical technician James Wolff told NBC
News. “’And when (we) didn’t have the opportunity to put our skills into
action, it’s difficult.’”[9]
In light of this, who were the qualified medical practitioners
pronounced the 20 children and 7 adults dead? Who decided that none
could be revived? Carver and his staff are apparently the only medical
personnel to have attended to the victims—yet this was in the postmortem
conducted several hours later. Such slipshod handling of the crime
scene leaves the State of Connecticut open to a potential array of hefty
civil claims by families of the slain.
Did a mass evacuation of the school take place?
Sandy Hook Elementary is attended by 600 students. Yet there is no
photographic or video evidence of an evacuation on this scale. Instead,
limited video and photographic imagery suggest that a limited evacuation
of perhaps at most several dozen students occurred.
A highky
A highly circulated photo depicts students walking in a single file
formation with their hands on each others’ shoulders and eyes shut. Yet
this was the image of a drill that took place prior to the event
itself.[10] Most other photos are portraits of individual children.
Despite aerial video footage of the event documenting law enforcement
scouring the scene and apprehending one or more suspects in the wooded
area nearby the school,[11] there is no such evidence that a mass exodus
of children from the school transpired once law enforcement pronounced
Sandy Hook secure. Nor are there videos or photos of several hundred
students and their parents at the oft-referenced fire station nearby
where students were routed for parent pick up.
Sound Bite Prism and the Will to Believe
Outside of a handful of citizen journalists and alternative media
commentators Sandy Hill’s dramatically shifting factual and
circumstantial terrain has escaped serious critique because it is
presented through major media’s carefully constructed prism of select
sound bites alongside a widespread and longstanding cultural impulse to
accept the pronouncements of experts, be they bemused physicians, high
ranking law enforcement officers, or political leaders demonstrating
emotionally-grounded concern.
Political scientist W. Lance Bennett calls this the news media’s
“authority-disorder bias.” “Whether the world is returned to a safe,
normal place,” Bennett writes, “or whether the very idea of a normal
world is called into question, the news is preoccupied with order, along
with related questions of whether authorities are capable of
establishing or restoring it.”[12]
Despite Carver’s bizarre performance and law enforcement authorities’
inability to settle on and relay simple facts, media management’s
impulse to assure audiences and readerships of the Newtown community’s
inevitable adjustment to its trauma and loss with the aid of the
government’s protective oversight—however incompetent that may be—far
surpasses a willingness to undermine this now almost universal news
media narrative with messy questions and suggestions of intrigue. This
well-worn script is one the public has been conditioned to accept. If
few people relied on such media to develop their world view this would
hardly be a concern. Yet this is regrettably not the case.
The Sandy Hook tragedy was on a far larger scale than the past year’s
numerous slaughters, including the Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting and
the Batman theater shooting in Colorado. It also included glaringly
illogical exercises and pronouncements by authorities alongside
remarkably unusual evidentiary fissures indistinguishable by an American
political imagination cultivated to believe that the corporate,
government and military’s sophisticated system of organized crime is
largely confined to Hollywood-style storylines while really existing
malfeasance and crises are without exception returned to normalcy.
If recent history is a prelude the likelihood of citizens
collectively assessing and questioning Sandy Hook is limited even given
the event’s overtly superficial trappings. While the incident is
ostensibly being handled by Connecticut law enforcement, early reports
indicate how federal authorities were on the scene as the 911 call was
received. Regardless of where one stands on the Second Amendment and gun
control, it is not unreasonable to suggest the Obama administration
complicity or direct oversight of an incident that has in very short
order sparked a national debate on the very topic—and not coincidentally
remains a key piece of Obama’s political platform.
The move to railroad this program through with the aid of major media
and an irrefutable barrage of children’s portraits, “heartfelt”
platitudes and ostensible tears neutralizes a quest for genuine
evidence, reasoned observation and in the case of Newtown honest and
responsible law enforcement. Moreover, to suggest that Obama is not
capable of deploying such techniques to achieve political ends is to
similarly place ones faith in image and interpretation above substance
and established fact, the exact inclination that in sum has brought
America to such an impasse.
[8] RadioMan911TV, “Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting Newtown Police / Fire and CT State Police,”
Youtube, December 14, 2012. At several points in this recording audio
is scrambled, particularly following apprehension of a second shooting
suspect outside the school, suggesting a purposeful attempt to withhold
vital information.
[12] W. Lance Bennett, News: The Politics of Illusion 9th Edition, Boston: Longman, 2012, 47. Andrew Whooley provided suggestions and research for this article.
Thursday, December 20th, 2012 | Posted by Niall Bradley
The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook
elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious
mass murders committed in the USA. By now, five days later, an official
version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of
events. The familiar ‘lone gunman’ narrative has once more stoked the
hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as
clueless as ever as to why people suddenly ‘go postal’ and target the
most vulnerable members of society.
On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these
mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports
present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the
final ‘official’ analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a
story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely
with the lone gunman narrative that I’m going to compile them here and
then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech
at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on
Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:
“So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the
spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really
happened, so let’s fix our eyes on what remains unseen…
A 20-year-old ‘tech geek’ named Adam Lanza is supposed to have
snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy
Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across
town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead
27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of
his guns on himself.
That’s how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?
All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7.
If there’s any saving grace to be found in this event, it’s that it was
all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene
“instantaneously”, according to Connecticut State Police Commander, Lt.
Vance and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school
teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old
Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:
The Newtown Bee
December 14, 2012
Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that
a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting
multiple shots – more than she could count – that went “on and on.”
How could the principal have survived to give this statement to local press describing what happened … if she was one of the first to be killed? Incidentally, The Newtown Bee‘s
article was taken down on Monday December 17th. Of course, a plausible
explanation is that a reporter mistook another teacher for the
principal.
We were initially told that two handguns – a Glock and a Sig Sauer –
were found next to the body of the dead shooter, while a third weapon, a
.223-caliber rifle was also recovered “in the trunk of a car” later, in
the school’s parking lot. All of the weapons were allegedly legally
bought and registered in Nancy Lanza’s name. The car was later
identified as a black Honda, also registered in her name. More weapons
have since been introduced to the story but we’ll get back to those
later on.
Besides anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ telling the media that
Adam Lanza was a former pupil at the school, they also said his mother
was currently a teacher there,
that she was found among the dead and that her son had specifically
sought out her classroom first. But when it emerged that teaching staff
at the school had never heard of a Nancy Lanza, it was suggested that she was a substitute teacher whose name therefore mightn’t appear on staff lists.
But this claim too has disappeared down the memory hole because it’s now known that Nancy had no connection with the school.
Adam Lanza was in fact home-schooled. Nancy Lanza has since been
painted as a “survivalist” who loved firearms, taught her sons how to
shoot and was “stockpiling” because she was “worried about economic
collapse.”
Daily Mail, UK December 16, 2012
Last night it also emerged Nancy was a member of the Doomsday
Preppers movement, which believes people should prepare for end of the
world.
Her former sister-in-law Marsha said she had turned her home ‘into a
fortress’. She added: ‘Nancy had a survivalist philosophy which is why
she was stockpiling guns. She had them for defense.
‘She was stockpiling food. She grew up on a farm in New Hampshire.
She was skilled with guns. We talked about preppers and preparing for
the economy collapsing.’
It’s not difficult to see that their efforts to insinuate that Nancy
Lanza was somehow responsible for this massacre by being an
irresponsible mother also serve to rile the large contingent of gun
owners in the country, particularly the far-right who see a conspiracy
on the government’s part to “take back our guns.” More on that later,
but for now I just want to note that all of the Lanza family members
seemed to live more or less normal middle-class lives. Yes, the parents
were divorced, but it was apparently amicable and
both put their own needs second to those of their children (and anyway,
divorce in the US these days is decidedly ‘normal middle class’).
Despite “family insiders”
claiming that he was a “deeply disturbed kid”, Adam Lanza, like so many
other alleged ‘lone(r) gunmen’ before him, does not fit the profile of a
mass-murdering maniac. His 24-year-old brother, Ryan Lanza, said he
hadn’t seen his brother since 2010.
This fact brings into question Ryan’s claim that his younger brother
may have had his identity card on his person at the school shooting.
Although perhaps the question that needs to be asked here is, why would a
person bother to carry identification with them after going to the
trouble of dressing up in a bullet-proof vest, mask and black camouflage
gear and going on a killing spree …
The live emergency services audio feed from the scene reveals some
interesting observations from first responders that have been completely
overlooked by the mainstream media. Note that the unedited version lasts over two hours, so the abridged version I’m
going to quote from has a compressed sequence of events that are not in
real time. In this abridged version, we hear at 1.38′ a report that
gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived.
The next report at 2.35′ says that the shooting has stopped and the
school is “in lockdown”. At 3.23′, the police relay a teacher’s report
that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, “Yeh, we got ‘em, they’re coming at me! … [inaudible] … coming up the driveway real slowly!” That same officer at 5.40′ says he has them “proned out”, which presumably means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground, before another officer comes on to say, “be aware that we do have a second [inaudible] …”
Later on, at 19.10′, an officer who sounds out of breath, like he’s
just given chase, reports what I think sounds like “these guys” followed
certainly by “multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun”.
If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the
initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found –
the above mentioned Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle? Further
conflicting, and possibly planted evidence was thrown into the mix by
‘law enforcement officials’ when they published video footage of
a long weapon being retrieved from the trunk of a car. Look closely and
you’ll see that it’s a shotgun, not a rifle. In addition, this
‘discovery’ was made late in the day (it’s dark outside), while the
Bushmaster rifle was first reported found “in the trunk of a car” much
earlier in the day. This would logically suggest that the rifle and
shotgun were found in the trunks of two different cars.
Besides the above two suspects “proned out” in front of the school,
another suspected gunman was apprehended after he gave chase, this time
in the woods next to the school:
The police are clearly chasing someone whom they appear to apprehend
in the middle of the woods next to the school, a fact confirmed by
several eyewitnesses:
This fleeing suspect, wearing camouflage gear, a bulletproof vest and armed with four guns, has
since disappeared from media coverage. Who was this person and how did
he know what “it” was when he protested that “I didn’t do it”?
Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here.
This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the
deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.
Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning
when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most
of Friday, the ‘lone shooter’ was erroneously reported as “Ryan Lanza,
confirmed dead.” At the same time, we were being told that Ryan’s
girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New
Jersey.
So this isn’t just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when
it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to
his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by ‘law enforcement officials’ at the scene of the shooting. It
could be that Ryan’s quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a
bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his
Facebook page may have saved his life.
Now remember, all of this confusion somehow resulted from a single
guy going into a school and shooting children and teachers and then
shooting himself, all within three to five minutes. Surely it should
have been fairly easy to rapidly and concretely identify the details of
such a crime and a rough layout of the scene?
What it’s starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for
this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and
even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the
school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in …
Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of … Ryan
Lanza! An older “confirmed” version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents’ homes and killing them before going to the school.
The narrative has now settled on the younger brother killing his
mother in Newtown then going to the school. So what about the rest of
it? Do we just put it down to ‘keen’ journalism that was having a field
day last Friday as media outlets sought to bring us the latest ‘breaking
news’? Confusion and ‘Chinese whispers’ undoubtedly play a part in the
early stages of national media events, but I think back to those news
anchors reading scripts about Osama Bin Laden within minutes of the
first plane being hit on 9/11 and I think, ‘Wait a minute!’ All these
misleading reports had to have been issued by someone or some people
“confirming” to Associated Press and other media outlets that the
Ryans’s father had been murdered [he wasn't even aware that the shooting
at the school had taken place until journalists turned up on his
doorstep], or that Ryan’s girlfriend had gone missing from Hoboken, or
that either Ryan or Adam were pulled out of the adjacent woods in
handcuffs yelling “I DIDN’T DO IT” to assembled parents. These aren’t just ‘little details’ that can be confused for other details, these are detailed narratives. So how, or why, would any member of the press come up with such details? They
strike me as a set of alternative scenarios that might have found their
way into the official narrative had facts on the ground turned out
differently.
Watch this snippet of State Police Lt. Paul Vance at the press
conference he gave the day after the shootings. His answer is as bizarre
as it is revealing. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection
with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both
unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely
undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the
woods:
Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been
rewritten to fit ‘new’ facts proclaimed by ‘law enforcement officials’.
Here’s an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the ‘same’ article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version:
The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol. The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter’s car.
The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the
shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine
would allow a shooter to fire “100″ rounds in such a short period.
Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows:
The massacre in Connecticut that’s taken the lives of at
least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a
Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:
The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster “assault-style” rifle.
Altogether, though, it doesn’t matter what type of weapon the shooter used.
The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic,
with enough rounds to shoot “100 shots” in a matter of minutes, as quoted in USA Today.
What actually happened may not matter to some, but surely a journalist’s role is to at least try to find out?
This Associated Press/Newsday article on Saturday, December 15th, reported that “Only the rifle was used on the victims“,
a statement that is supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut
state’s chief medical examiner. Of the seven autopsies he personally
performed on Sandy Hook victims, all of them had “three to 11 wounds apiece”. He also said that the ‘gunman’ used a military-style rifle rigged to quickly reload, and that the ‘shooter’ was able to reload so quickly because he had “taped two magazines together.”
Even before the State Chief Medical Examiner had given these
statements, it had been stated that spent shell casings from
.233-caliber (rifle) bullets were found inside the school.
So all the victims’ wounds were the result of rifle-fire, specifically from “the rifle”, the one we were told in early reports was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot! This is simply not credible.
Remember that only “the rifle” was used on all the victims. If only this
rifle was used, and if we try to make this claim fit into the
(admittedly fluid) official version of events, then the alleged lone
gunman would have had to leave the school, place the rifle back in his
trunk, then return inside the school and shoot himself. No one reported
any such maneuver on the part of any gunman or gunmen. What we do have,
however, is live emergency services radio feed in which we hear that
two men have been apprehended and are “proned out” AND live video
footage supported by eyewitness testimony showing what appears to be a
THIRD man being arrested by police in the woods.
We can see how the authorities’ hands are tied because they need to fit all the facts into the usual ‘lone gunman’ narrative.
For that, there can only be ONE rifle and a couple of handguns. The
problem is that they have already claimed to find that solitary
Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of a car in the school parking lot, so the
earliest police reports of a cache of long arms being found inside the
school will no longer fit with the lone gunman narrative, especially as
they’re now saying that he had already opened fire as he burst into the
school.
Could “scrawny” 20-year-old Adam Lanza have stormed the school, solo
Rambo-style, while carrying “multiple long arms, including rifles and
shotguns”? Only one person was wounded. Everyone else who was shot was
killed. How could Adam Lanza achieve such deadly accuracy, in such a
short length of recorded time?
Initial reports put the beginning of the shooting in the school
administrators’ office, where someone, reportedly the school principal,
had a confrontation with the gunman(men). We know this because someone
supposedly turned on the school intercom system, alerting the teaching
staff to the loud swearing and commotion in the principal’s office and
probably saving many more children from being gunned down as teachers
took measures to hide the children in closets.
Similarly heavily armed men wearing black combat gear from head to
toe… their job is to kill ‘terrorists’ to keep us safe, which they do by
terrorising us all
One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a
bathroom and locked the door. What’s interesting about her testimony to
ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that “if
they were really cops, they’d know where to find keys to open the
door.” In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the
door.
Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly
suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that
multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either
impersonating police officers or were indistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It
also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting
was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that
bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.
There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the
building. We were told initially that they came in through the main
front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators’/principal’s
offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a
video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them
in. A “masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear” from head
to toe would kinda raise red flags, don’t you think?
Another possible anomaly is
that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears
to have had an ‘in memoriam’ Facebook page created in her name four
days before the shooting.
Regarding this alleged ‘LIBOR scandal’ connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes
were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must
remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to
create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in
a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in
the face is that the official accounts of these events are hocus-pocus.
The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple
shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple
gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all
officially claimed to have been carried out by ‘lone gunmen’. This
logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with
cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known,
some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.
Wade Michael Page, the ‘lone gunman’ in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen
by witnesses? It can’t surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?)
military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during
the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested
this was a ‘false-flag’ event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian
Candidate.
But maybe there’s a simpler explanation
(albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they
found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the
gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are
reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly
in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about
at best, or protected by the Federal Government at worst. Based on the
authorities’ persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this
school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the
Connecticut State Medical Examiner’s report that all the victims were
riddled with bullets from a rifle that we’re simultaneously being asked
to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of
multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the
media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun
control … I’m left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?
Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a ‘death squad’ and a
carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the
government, in combination with perception management to shape the
narrative and vector the emotional fallout?
Gun control isn’t really the issue here. Control – period – is the issue. The
U.S. government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit
the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned
(it’s “just a goddamned piece of paper“,
remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to
weapons. That we’ve seen gun sales increase in the last few days to the
point where Wal-Mart is all out of assault rifles is wholly unsurprising.
The psychopaths in power have absolutely
no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the
deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In
effect, this is little different from what the U.S. government calls
counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it
attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were
killed by ‘communists’, ‘terrorists’, ‘insurgents’ or ‘militants’, with
the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common
people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the
‘evil-doers’. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end
result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police
state.
Newtown school shooting story already being changed by the media to eliminate eyewitness reports of a second shooter by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
(NaturalNews) The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the
tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have
reportedly been killed, including 18 children.
As always, when
violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the
question: "Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?"
One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman,
indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often
mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora "Batman" shooter James Holmes,
for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control
technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical
mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizona in 2011.
According
to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at
least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado,
James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter
involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second
shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a
"lone gunman."
Today, the exact same thing is happening with the Newton, CT school shooting.
Eyewitness reports of a second shooter now being "scrubbed" from the news
As the story of this shooting was first breaking, the news was reporting a second gunman.
FoxNews reported
that this second gunman was "led out of the woods by officers" and then
questioned. The original source of this report was the Connecticut
Post.
A local CBS affiliate
was also reporting the existence of a second gunman and said "Police
believe there may be a second gunman and are looking for a red or maroon
van with its back window blown out..."
A local CT CBS affiliate
was also reporting, "CBS News reports that a potential second shooter
is in custody and that SWAT is now investigating the home of the
suspect. A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the
woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and
telling parents on the scene, 'I did not do it.'"
But the more
recent stories being put out by the media are scrubbing any mention of a
second gunman and going with the "lone gunman" explanation, which holds
about as much water as the "lone gunman" explanation of the JFK
assassination.
"A lone gunman killed 27 people at an elementary
school here, including 18 children, in a terrifying early Friday morning
shooting spree," reports USA Today. It makes no mention whatsoever of a second gunman.
NBC News
is also now chiming in with the "lone gunman" version of the story,
eliminating any mention of a second gunman from its coverage of the
tragic event.
Another story authored by NBC News
carries the title, "26 dead after lone gunman assaults Connecticut
elementary school." Once again, no mention of a second gunman as
reported by eyewitnesses.
When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy
Journalists
are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now
is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage
after the first few hours of this story developing?
And why is
there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to
be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror
of all the innocent deaths?
This story is continuing to develop, and we'll keep asking questions here on Natural News.
Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by
this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken
place here, shouldn't we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these
shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled
shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?
For
the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the
bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping
this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future.
