NB Commentary: What tickles me most about this
thing. They outright stole the vote from Bernie, what makes them think that
they wouldn't steal the vote from Trump, which is why he HAD to encourage a
landslide. Yet the Clintonians are in the streets tearing up shit cause she
didn't win. They actually wanted their winner to be the Cheater-In Chief. This
election was a trainwreck the worse I have ever seen and both candidates
suck!!!
When you have a
system where it tells you that you have to vote... folks feel compelled to do
so, even though they vote against their interests, time and time again. And
when it doesn't turn out correctly they scream and holler and complain about
how unfair it is. Bu they don't get it, ain't this democracy? Ain't this the
system where the majority can rule over the minority? Ain't this the system
where if you don't like what the majority has chosen for your leader, that you
have a few options, and only a few,
1. you can suck it
up
2. you can complain
3. you can actively
protest
4. you can write
your other leaders
5 . you can vote all
the other leaders out next time
and
6. Stick your guy in
there so he/she can rule and dominate over the other people's choice.
Democracy is a
failed system and needs to be abolished!
People believe in it
like it is some kind of Divinity when it has proven time and time again to be
the bastion of corruption and failed and harmful policies over and over and
over again.
So the definition of
insanity is.......
You fill in the
blanks.
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA
Protesters against
President-elect Donald Trump gather in an intersection outside the Humphrey
School of Affairs on the campus of the University of Minnesota on November 10,
2016 in Minneapolis. Thousands of people across the country have taken to the
streets in protest in the days following the election of Republican Donald
Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
Remember
that illusory “hope and change thing” from 2008?
Tens of
millions fell for it. Obama looked SO different from Bush. So we assumed
his policies would be different.
Bad
assumption. And now, eight years later, many of us are making the same mistake.
Trump
looks SO different from Obama, who comes across as a sensitive, educated,
literate, liberal, wishy-washy, black, globalist anti-racist. Trump embodies
the precise opposite of all these qualities: He is an ultra-assertive
insensitive racist nativist nationalist boor who has never finished a
serious book in his life.
I wrote
most of the first edition of this
book BEFORE the 2008 election – and called the entire Obama presidency
right. Now, in this article, I’m calling the Trump presidency…before it has
even started. (Hope I’m wrong.)
Such differences
are purely superficial, designed to hypnotize us into imagining that we are
living in a democracy. In reality, presidents are just front men for the global
elite and the powerful interests they represent. Their job is to provide a change
of scenery so that business-as-usual can continue unmolested by plebs seeking a
bigger slice of the pie. To create a really enthralling change of scenery,
something to utterly hypnotize the masses and distract them from the
actual dire situation, the DIPS (Dominant Inbred Psychopaths) have learned to
bring on a front man who seemingly offers the greatest possible contrast with
the previous front man.
Hillary
didn’t offer enough contrast with Obama; her real function was to play the foil
for the rise of Trump. Like Obama, she’s liberal, educated, literate, a little
too smooth, and basically a compromiser who identifies with the left wing of
the power elite and shares its globalist ideals. And just as Obama was the
first black president, Hillary would have been the first woman president.
Symbolically as well as in actuality, a Hillary presidency would have been
another Obama presidency. That would have driven the Obama-haters nuts. They
had to be thrown a bone, just as the Bush-haters were thrown a bone with the
coronation of Obama in 2008.
Some criticize Trump for his lack of political
experience. But the truth is that Trump’s background provides perfect
preparation for the presidency: He is a lifelong front-man for organized crime.
Trump got his job in the Meyer Lansky mob through his mentor, Roy Cohn.
Fronting for organized crime, and fronting for the government of the United
States, is pretty much the same thing these days. Trump has got plenty of the
only kind of experience that really counts.
But
experienced or not, Trump (like Obama, and Bush before him) is being set up to
fail. The truth is that America is becoming increasingly ungovernable, and
nobody will be able to change that – at least not for a very long time. The
USA’s national identity, and its citizens’ governability, is predicated on
endless rapid economic growth with benefits enjoyed by all, or at least most.
But the era of rapid American economic growth is over, and such new wealth as
is being created is hogged by the top .01%. Ordinary people are facing life
sentences of permanent stagnation or worse, and their children’s lot will be
even worse than theirs.
These
are structural problems that cannot be solved by anything short of revolution –
not the illusory revolution offered as a marketing slogan, along with cosmetic
reforms, by the likes of Bernie Sanders, but real revolution. (And/or the
breakout of “free energy” technologies.)
As the
BBC documentary The Power of Nightmares explains,
the era of the politics of hope (predicated on endless economic growth and
equitably shared benefits) has been eclipsed in the post-9/11 era by the
politics of fear.
Bush-Cheney
inaugurated the fear era with a satanic public ceremony: The human sacrifice of
3,000 people on 9/11/01. When people started catching on, PRESTO-CHANGE-O they
wheeled out Obama, the anti-Bush, to distract, hypnotize and stupefy the
anti-Bush crowd. Now people have caught on that the 2008 recession never ended
and will never end (at least not for ordinary folks) so the illusion of another
massive change is necessary. Bring on Trump, the ultimate distraction, to
mollify the Obama-haters!
Trump’s
superficial anti-globalist anti-New-World-Order facade is going to be set up to
take the blame for the bad stuff that’s coming. The globalists will say: See,
we told you that Trump and his nationalist nativism would be a disaster! Then
they’ll wheel out the anti-Trump, whether in 2020 or 2024, who will be totally
pro-globalist, maybe outright pro-world-government, and who will offer the
greatest possible superficial and meaningless contrast with Trump himself, who
will be even more loathed then than he is now.
The
whole time, business-as-usual will continue, perhaps interrupted by one or more
spectacular false flags to keep the fear level raised to orange.
You
don’t have to be Nostradamus to figure this stuff out. It’s all right there in
front of anyone with eyes to see.
Excerpt: "He (Wanta) was
tasked by President Reagan and CIA Director William Colby to destabilize the
Soviet Union through establishment, with funds from the US Treasury, of a
worldwide currency trading scheme......."
Being
Robin Hood and taking down another government to support your own is a very
interesting angle as it relates to extortion. The mission may have had some
honest intentions but the idea of going after the Soviet Union in a
"scheme" that would make trillions of dollars for the US is to me a
question of ethics. Is it okay to do someone in so you can do for someone else?
Well one thing that is for sure, there is no honesty among thieves. The issue
of "my money" is a dubious one notwithstanding how you got "your
money" in the first place.
For a
long time a family member of mine was a pimp. He amassed great sums of money.
When he offered it to me, I refused. I did not want money that was gotten under
duress, torture, abuse or any other such thing.
Are the
American people so shallow that they do not care, how they got the money, just
that now they can use it? Are the American Christians and ethical social beings
that shallow that they will look the other way, knowing that the money was
ill-gotten in the first place, but yeah, we got millions of jobs out the deal?
Are Americans so separated from the law of "what goes around comes
around" that they think that since the "shake down of the Soviet
Union" economy would not bite them in the ass as the Soviet Union and her
descendants attempt to get themselves back on track knowing that it was the
work of an American President that put them in the cross-hairs in the first
place?
To
answer my own question, yes, in fact most people are that shallow. They do not
realize that everything is energy and an exchange of energy, in this instance
"ill-gotten money" will not bode well in the future. For instance, if
one is willing to do something criminal to someone else, what makes them think
they are "safe" from anyone else wanting to do something criminal to
them?
People
who rally in support of criminalizing these two "culprits" who
attempted to shake Mr. Wanta down are just as guilty as the party that Wanta
engaged in to shake down the Soviet Union. There are no innocents in this kind
of "economic tyranny" on all sides. The economies based on the
Western Model is a ponzy scheme, no matter how you slice it. Issuing W9's is no
clearance for the fact that a substantial amount of interest was amassed for
the Banksters and Crooks of the world to leverage their bets and hedge funds as
this "fiat money" traveled around the globe.
Who in
this day and time can even imagine having $trillions of dollars in their bank
account?Who can imagine in this day and time having even billions? In fact, who
really knows how billions become trillions when millions are homeless and even
more millions of homes lie vacant?
Is there
a viable resolve for one to come to in a corrupt economy ran by corrupt
banksters backed by corrupt corporations and governments?
Again,
the fact that people feel that Mr. Wanta has been "mistreated, threatened
or bribed" have their eyes veiled by the deception of the "currency
trading scheme" and I would dare to mention the reason why. All for the
love of money.
There
are no victims in this case and there are no innocents either. IMHO
“Former Tenn. Gov. Don Sundquist and S. Dakota Sen. Sheldon Songstad may face not just the largest bribery charge in history but conspiracy to murder as well.”
[ Editor's note: You just can't make this stuff up. Two crooked aging politicians, who appear to be uber bagmen for Capitol Hill, don't disconnect a voice mail message left for their shake down victim, and then the caller rings up his co-conspirator to discuss their next move, including killing their target if they don't get paid.
But there is just one problem. The whole six-minute conversation goes into Lee Wanta's voice mail, which the jury is going to enjoy immensely. Lee calls his rather extensive security team to ask what to do, and here we are... doing it.
This murder conspiracy case might also break the media blackout on the Wanta case, which has gone on since 2006, after the Treasury Dept. snatched his $4.5-million wire transfer from China into the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, only to be tranferred to Goldman Sachs the next day; and off to Europe it went as part of the $16 trillion of liquidity pumped into the banking system there during the meltdown.
I wish I could say this was an unusual case, but really, only the amounts involved are. These two yo-yos... there is an army of ex-office holders who would be doing exactly what these two thought was going to be their final wet dream.
If we were really to round up all of them doing this kind of stuff, there would be so many special elections going on that they would run out of press people to cover them. And no, I am not exaggerating... Jim W. Dean ]
What is
amazing about this case is the amount of money involved, totaling $9.5 trillion
US dollars, in fact the entire GNP of the United States for several years.
Sundquist
and Songstad, wanted $30 billion out of the proceeds to pay themselves along
with Congress, the US Treasury Department, five Supreme Court justices and
two former US presidents.
Best of
all, the whole thing is on tape, a “shakedown” attempt against Ambassador Lee
Wanta, former White House intelligence chief under President Ronald Reagan and
editor at Veterans Today.
Sundquist and Songstad left, on a recording at
Wanta’s embassy, full details, not only of their ability to virtually buy the
entire US government and deliver a multi-trillion dollar settlement authorized
to Wanta by the US Supreme Court, but were recorded making arrangements for the
murder of Wanta as well.
May 26, 2013 KNOW YOUR HISTORY: Memorial Day was started by former slaves on May, 1, 1865 in Charleston, SC to honor 257 dead Union Soldiers who had been buried in a mass grave in a Confederate prison camp. They dug up the bodies and worked for 2 weeks to give them a proper burial as gratitude for fighting for their freedom. They then held a parade of 10,000 people led by 2,800 Black children where they marched, sang and celebrated.Thanks to Abstrakt Goldsmith for this nugget of history that most of us never learned in school.
To this, I say, why do we fight?? What is it about human nature that
makes them believe that they must kill other human beings for their
freedom?
The Glory of war is not glorious. Ask those
who do fight. The first casualty of war is "Truth". People are trained,
brainwashed and distorted to believe that their leaders who do this to
them would not lie to them, would not line their pockets with blood
money and would care for them upon their return from the Battlefield.
All
to often we see our fellow human beings become inhuman in their acts of
warring against other human beings. And then they return home and are
given ribbons, ribbons that honor how heroically they "killed" another
human being for our "freedom"? The depth of the absurdity and cognitive
dissonance is overwhelming. How does creating a war culture, a
militarized environment, a police state, a surveillance state a cult of
oppression of other human beings, give us freedom?
Our
troops have their humanity removed from them as they are trained to
believe that killing for freedom is tantamount to Patriotism. Patriotism
is tantamount to all previously perceived values and standards. To be
Patriotic means to stand by your government, even if it is found to be
lying and creating scenarios in which you must risk your life and kill
others, conquer others and invade others to maintain your freedom at
home. The stalk reality that this aggression breeds more aggression and
diminishes humanity to a banal state to me is the result of mass graves
and disregard of the humanity of others.
This is not a
political, racial, ethnic, national problem, it is a human problem, and
it is the human being who continually takes the freedom and sovereignty
of other humans in their so-called quest for "freedom" at home. An
aerial view of this idiocy could cause humanity to stop and think, what
is the purpose of this? Who profits? And more importantly, what is this
doing to our basic humanity? Is it really about defense or is it really
about DOMINANCE?
Links and Commentary:There appears to be many variations on this theme and a bit of a debate as to who started what and when. The links below will show the differences in the history and opinions on this. I think that this story shows the true horrors of war, something that would have been denied or ignored not because the Freedmen acknowledged the fallen soldiers but because of the way those fallen soldiers were treated on American soil.
From Dalp Pearson Here is a tid-bit of back story on this photograph -- Union Cemetery During the closing days of the Civil War, the area was used as a prisoner-of-war camp. More than two hundred Union soldiers died in the camp and were buried in a mass grave at the site. Union soldiers were buried behind the old racetrack's stands near the present intersection of Tenth Ave. and Mary Murray Drive. In an article titled "The First Decoration Day", David W. Blight of Yale has written:[3] "The city was largely abandoned by white residents by late February. Among the first troops to enter and march up Meeting Street singing liberation songs was the 21st U. S. Colored Infantry; their commander accepted the formal surrender of the city. "Thousands of black Charlestonians, most former slaves, remained in the city and conducted a series of commemorations to declare their sense of the meaning of the war. The largest of these events, and unknown until some extraordinary luck in my recent research, took place on May 1, 1865. During the final year of the war, the Confederates had converted the planters' horse track, the Washington Race Course and Jockey Club, into an outdoor prison. Union soldiers were kept in horrible conditions in the interior of the track; at least 257 died of exposure and disease and were hastily buried in a mass grave behind the grandstand. Some twenty-eight black workmen went to the site, re-buried the Union dead properly, and built a high fence around the cemetery. They whitewashed the fence and built an archway over an entrance on which they inscribed the words, 'Martyrs of the Race Course'. "Then, black Charlestonians in cooperation with white missionaries and teachers, staged an unforgettable parade of 10,000 people on the slaveholders' race course. The symbolic power of the low-country planter aristocracy's horse track (where they had displayed their wealth, leisure, and influence) was not lost on the freedpeople. A New York Tribune correspondent witnessed the event, describing 'a procession of friends and mourners as South Carolina and the United States never saw before.' "At 9 am on May 1, the procession stepped off led by three thousand black schoolchildren carrying arm loads of roses and singing 'John Brown's Body.' The children were followed by several hundred black women with baskets of flowers, wreaths and crosses. Then came black men marching in cadence, followed by contingents of Union infantry and other black and white citizens. As many as possible gathering in the cemetery enclosure; a childrens' choir sang 'We'll Rally around the Flag,' the 'Star-Spangled Banner,' and several spirituals before several black ministers read from scripture. No record survives of which biblical passages rung out in the warm spring air, but the spirit of Leviticus 25 was surely present at those burial rites: 'for it is the jubilee; it shall be holy unto you … in the year of this jubilee he shall return every man unto his own possession.' "Following the solemn dedication the crowd dispersed into the infield and did what many of us do on Memorial Day: they enjoyed picnics, listened to speeches, and watched soldiers drill. Among the full brigade of Union infantry participating was the famous 54th Massachusetts and the 34th and 104th U.S. Colored Troops, who performed a special double-columned march around the gravesite. The war was over, and Decoration Day had been founded by African Americans in a ritual of remembrance and consecration. The war, they had boldly announced, had been all about the triumph of their emancipation over a slaveholders' republic, and not about state rights, defense of home, nor merely soldiers' valor and sacrifice." By late April 1865, a white picket fence on which was written "The Martyrs of the Race Course" had been erected.[4] On May 1, 1865, thousands of people, mainly newly freed blacks, processed to the site, and members of the 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry marched around the site. The graves were decorated, speeches were offered, and celebrants enjoyed picnics in the area.[5] This has been cited as the first Memorial Day celebration. By 1871, the cemetery was suffering neglect, and the soldiers were reinterred at the Beaufort[3] and Florence National Cemeteries.
" In the May 1865, the newspaper covered what
Blight argues should be credited as the nation’s first memorial day
observance, held on May 1, 1865. At that time, Charleston was largely in
ruins and families were eager to rebuild their lives and their city.
The photos on this page are Library of Congress images from the era. Two
simply show scenes of wartime devastation in the city. But the photo at
right here appears to show the land where the former Confederate prison
camp stood (also the site of a pre-Civil War Race Course). The photo
appears to show work beginning on raising the remains in April 1865 in
preparation for the new cemetery that eventually would include a wall,
an archway entrance and properly buried remains. The Daily Courier coverage of that first memorial day, May 1, 1865, was headlined …
From: Navneet Gupta “The greatest purveyor of violence in the world is my own government, I cannot be silent” “A nation that year after year continues to spend more money on military defense than on social uplift is approaching spiritual death” “We have guided missiles, yet misguided men.” - Martin Luther King, Jr.(1929 – 1968) Militarism is glorified in the west. We are asked to “remember” the fallen, yet keep fighting in these same unjust conflicts at the same time (many of which we are responsible for starting). It makes no sense? The U.S. is one of only two countries which has not ratified the convention regarding the use of child soldiers. They are also the largest arms dealers in the world (here is our WMD). War is all about greed, power, and exploiting the powerless. War has nothing to do with freedom, loving your country, or being a hero. War is about killing innocent people, stealing what they have and keeping power over them through violence & propaganda. A FRACTION of the money spent on the military industrial complex could eradicate hunger (Food, Not Bombs!), and all other social and ecological problems humanity faces (saving lives instead of taking them). 'Developed' nations along with their corporate raiders prop up a corrupt elite at the top of poor nations through the selling of arms, funding, ‘development’, loans, etc. This has allowed for the extraction of indigenous wealth from the southern hemisphere to the northern hemisphere (Often referred to as ‘Neocolonialism’)
Was gonna share this video on Facebook, but I think not. How is it that "Sept. 11, 2001 Osama bin Laden used expert CIA training to murder 3000 people?" Has this been proven? Last on this, those so-called terrorist couldn't fly a plane straight, much less maneuver 1 into the towers 2x's& avoid detection as it careened into the Pentagon. Michael Moore at best gives facts & at worst, throws a dis-info tidbit just to see if you are paying attention. Not cool, so what part do you believe? Dis-info discredits. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbjr_cPS9_A
Thursday, December 20th, 2012 | Posted by Niall Bradley
The massacre of 20 children and 7 adults at the Sandy Hook
elementary school last Friday was one more in a long line of atrocious
mass murders committed in the USA. By now, five days later, an official
version of events has more or less solidified to explain the chain of
events. The familiar ‘lone gunman’ narrative has once more stoked the
hot-button issue of gun control and left the general population as
clueless as ever as to why people suddenly ‘go postal’ and target the
most vulnerable members of society.
On closer inspection, however, there is clearly more to many of these
mass shootings than meets the eye. Very often the earliest reports
present information that directly contradicts key foundations of the
final ‘official’ analysis of events. Granted, confusion is natural when a
story breaks, but some of the initial reports conflict so completely
with the lone gunman narrative that I’m going to compile them here and
then try to put this tragedy in a more objective context. In his speech
at the Sandy Hook Interfaith Prayer Vigil in Newtown, Connecticut on
Sunday night, President Obama quoted the following biblical passage:
“So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen, since what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal.” ~ 2 Corinthians 4:18
The traumatised Newtown community deserves the facts without the
spin. Everyone touched by this brutal event deserves to know what really
happened, so let’s fix our eyes on what remains unseen…
A 20-year-old ‘tech geek’ named Adam Lanza is supposed to have
snapped early last Friday, December 14th, shot dead his mother Nancy
Lanza, loaded her car up with her guns and ammo, then driven it across
town to his former school, the Sandy Hook Elementary School, shot dead
27 people in two classrooms and an adjoining hallway, then turned one of
his guns on himself.
That’s how most will now remember the shooting, but is that actually what happened?
All the child victims were first-graders between the ages of 6 and 7.
If there’s any saving grace to be found in this event, it’s that it was
all over within minutes. Police were reportedly on the scene
“instantaneously”, according to Connecticut State Police Commander, Lt.
Vance and by then the shooting had ended. Listed among the slain school
teachers and administrative staff was the school principal, 47-year-old
Dawn Hochsprung. Right here we encounter our first problem:
The Newtown Bee
December 14, 2012
Sandy Hook School Principal Dawn Hochsprung told The Bee that
a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting
multiple shots – more than she could count – that went “on and on.”
How could the principal have survived to give this statement to local press describing what happened … if she was one of the first to be killed? Incidentally, The Newtown Bee‘s
article was taken down on Monday December 17th. Of course, a plausible
explanation is that a reporter mistook another teacher for the
principal.
We were initially told that two handguns – a Glock and a Sig Sauer –
were found next to the body of the dead shooter, while a third weapon, a
.223-caliber rifle was also recovered “in the trunk of a car” later, in
the school’s parking lot. All of the weapons were allegedly legally
bought and registered in Nancy Lanza’s name. The car was later
identified as a black Honda, also registered in her name. More weapons
have since been introduced to the story but we’ll get back to those
later on.
Besides anonymous ‘law enforcement officials’ telling the media that
Adam Lanza was a former pupil at the school, they also said his mother
was currently a teacher there,
that she was found among the dead and that her son had specifically
sought out her classroom first. But when it emerged that teaching staff
at the school had never heard of a Nancy Lanza, it was suggested that she was a substitute teacher whose name therefore mightn’t appear on staff lists.
But this claim too has disappeared down the memory hole because it’s now known that Nancy had no connection with the school.
Adam Lanza was in fact home-schooled. Nancy Lanza has since been
painted as a “survivalist” who loved firearms, taught her sons how to
shoot and was “stockpiling” because she was “worried about economic
collapse.”
Daily Mail, UK December 16, 2012
Last night it also emerged Nancy was a member of the Doomsday
Preppers movement, which believes people should prepare for end of the
world.
Her former sister-in-law Marsha said she had turned her home ‘into a
fortress’. She added: ‘Nancy had a survivalist philosophy which is why
she was stockpiling guns. She had them for defense.
‘She was stockpiling food. She grew up on a farm in New Hampshire.
She was skilled with guns. We talked about preppers and preparing for
the economy collapsing.’
It’s not difficult to see that their efforts to insinuate that Nancy
Lanza was somehow responsible for this massacre by being an
irresponsible mother also serve to rile the large contingent of gun
owners in the country, particularly the far-right who see a conspiracy
on the government’s part to “take back our guns.” More on that later,
but for now I just want to note that all of the Lanza family members
seemed to live more or less normal middle-class lives. Yes, the parents
were divorced, but it was apparently amicable and
both put their own needs second to those of their children (and anyway,
divorce in the US these days is decidedly ‘normal middle class’).
Despite “family insiders”
claiming that he was a “deeply disturbed kid”, Adam Lanza, like so many
other alleged ‘lone(r) gunmen’ before him, does not fit the profile of a
mass-murdering maniac. His 24-year-old brother, Ryan Lanza, said he
hadn’t seen his brother since 2010.
This fact brings into question Ryan’s claim that his younger brother
may have had his identity card on his person at the school shooting.
Although perhaps the question that needs to be asked here is, why would a
person bother to carry identification with them after going to the
trouble of dressing up in a bullet-proof vest, mask and black camouflage
gear and going on a killing spree …
The live emergency services audio feed from the scene reveals some
interesting observations from first responders that have been completely
overlooked by the mainstream media. Note that the unedited version lasts over two hours, so the abridged version I’m
going to quote from has a compressed sequence of events that are not in
real time. In this abridged version, we hear at 1.38′ a report that
gunfire is still being heard, even though the shooting was supposed to have ended by the time police arrived.
The next report at 2.35′ says that the shooting has stopped and the
school is “in lockdown”. At 3.23′, the police relay a teacher’s report
that she saw “two shadows running past the gym”. This is followed by another officer on the scene who says, “Yeh, we got ‘em, they’re coming at me! … [inaudible] … coming up the driveway real slowly!” That same officer at 5.40′ says he has them “proned out”, which presumably means he has apprehended them and they are laid out on the ground, before another officer comes on to say, “be aware that we do have a second [inaudible] …”
Later on, at 19.10′, an officer who sounds out of breath, like he’s
just given chase, reports what I think sounds like “these guys” followed
certainly by “multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotgun”.
If these were found so early on, why were they not included in the
initial press reports which stated that three firearms had been found –
the above mentioned Glock, Sig Sauer and Bushmaster AR-15 rifle? Further
conflicting, and possibly planted evidence was thrown into the mix by
‘law enforcement officials’ when they published video footage of
a long weapon being retrieved from the trunk of a car. Look closely and
you’ll see that it’s a shotgun, not a rifle. In addition, this
‘discovery’ was made late in the day (it’s dark outside), while the
Bushmaster rifle was first reported found “in the trunk of a car” much
earlier in the day. This would logically suggest that the rifle and
shotgun were found in the trunks of two different cars.
Besides the above two suspects “proned out” in front of the school,
another suspected gunman was apprehended after he gave chase, this time
in the woods next to the school:
The police are clearly chasing someone whom they appear to apprehend
in the middle of the woods next to the school, a fact confirmed by
several eyewitnesses:
This fleeing suspect, wearing camouflage gear, a bulletproof vest and armed with four guns, has
since disappeared from media coverage. Who was this person and how did
he know what “it” was when he protested that “I didn’t do it”?
Perhaps most astonishingly, this suspect arrested in the woods was named in an Associated Press report as 24-year-old Ryan Lanza. The original report has long since vanished of course, but you can see it referenced here.
This was despite the fact that Ryan had already been named as the
deceased suspect inside the school, lying next to two handguns.
Ryan Lanza was actually at work in Hoboken, New Jersey, that morning
when his name and photo began circulating in the media. And so, for most
of Friday, the ‘lone shooter’ was erroneously reported as “Ryan Lanza,
confirmed dead.” At the same time, we were being told that Ryan’s
girlfriend and a room-mate were reported missing, also from Hoboken, New
Jersey.
So this isn’t just a case of mistaken identity, as later claimed when
it was suggested that Adam had a piece of identification belonging to
his brother on his person. Not one, but BOTH Lanza brothers were being placed by ‘law enforcement officials’ at the scene of the shooting. It
could be that Ryan’s quick reflexes to leave his workplace to get on a
bus to go back to his apartment while protesting innocence via his
Facebook page may have saved his life.
Now remember, all of this confusion somehow resulted from a single
guy going into a school and shooting children and teachers and then
shooting himself, all within three to five minutes. Surely it should
have been fairly easy to rapidly and concretely identify the details of
such a crime and a rough layout of the scene?
What it’s starting to look like is that the Lanzas were framed for
this mass shooting in advance. Long before any suspects were named, and
even as we were being told that Nancy Lanza was among the dead at the
school, we were told that police were investigating a murder in …
Hoboken, New Jersey, where a body had been found at the home of … Ryan
Lanza! An older “confirmed” version of events had RYAN, not Adam, travelling to Hoboken that morning to murder his father before going to the school in Newtown, Connecticut. Other variants had Ryan OR Adam going to both their divorced parents’ homes and killing them before going to the school.
The narrative has now settled on the younger brother killing his
mother in Newtown then going to the school. So what about the rest of
it? Do we just put it down to ‘keen’ journalism that was having a field
day last Friday as media outlets sought to bring us the latest ‘breaking
news’? Confusion and ‘Chinese whispers’ undoubtedly play a part in the
early stages of national media events, but I think back to those news
anchors reading scripts about Osama Bin Laden within minutes of the
first plane being hit on 9/11 and I think, ‘Wait a minute!’ All these
misleading reports had to have been issued by someone or some people
“confirming” to Associated Press and other media outlets that the
Ryans’s father had been murdered [he wasn't even aware that the shooting
at the school had taken place until journalists turned up on his
doorstep], or that Ryan’s girlfriend had gone missing from Hoboken, or
that either Ryan or Adam were pulled out of the adjacent woods in
handcuffs yelling “I DIDN’T DO IT” to assembled parents. These aren’t just ‘little details’ that can be confused for other details, these are detailed narratives. So how, or why, would any member of the press come up with such details? They
strike me as a set of alternative scenarios that might have found their
way into the official narrative had facts on the ground turned out
differently.
Watch this snippet of State Police Lt. Paul Vance at the press
conference he gave the day after the shootings. His answer is as bizarre
as it is revealing. When asked whether Nancy Lanza had any connection
with the school, he replied defensively about something that is both
unrelated and arguably the most significant fact that completely
undermines the official narrative: the arrest of a second gunman in the
woods:
Most of the initial mainstream media reports have since been
rewritten to fit ‘new’ facts proclaimed by ‘law enforcement officials’.
Here’s an example from Business Insider. The following excerpts are the opening paragraphs from the ‘same’ article, one earlier original version, followed by the later revised version:
The massacre [...] was reportedly perpetrated with a .233 caliber rifle, a Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol. The Bushmaster rifle was found in the trunk of the shooter’s car.
The Sig Sauer and Glock pistols were the only weapons used in the
shooting, according to CBS. Now the question is what kind of magazine
would allow a shooter to fire “100″ rounds in such a short period.
Indeed, I was wondering the same thing. How could two pistols do so much damage? The report was updated as follows:
The massacre in Connecticut that’s taken the lives of at
least 26 people was reportedly perpetrated with a .223 caliber rifle, a
Glock pistol and a Sig Sauer pistol, according to NBC:
The shooter was using one Sig Sauer and one Glock pistol, according to CNN. Later details emerged that the primary weapon was the Bushmaster “assault-style” rifle.
Altogether, though, it doesn’t matter what type of weapon the shooter used.
The bottom line is that it was likely a magazine fed, semi-automatic,
with enough rounds to shoot “100 shots” in a matter of minutes, as quoted in USA Today.
What actually happened may not matter to some, but surely a journalist’s role is to at least try to find out?
This Associated Press/Newsday article on Saturday, December 15th, reported that “Only the rifle was used on the victims“,
a statement that is supported by Dr. H. Wayne Carver II, Connecticut
state’s chief medical examiner. Of the seven autopsies he personally
performed on Sandy Hook victims, all of them had “three to 11 wounds apiece”. He also said that the ‘gunman’ used a military-style rifle rigged to quickly reload, and that the ‘shooter’ was able to reload so quickly because he had “taped two magazines together.”
Even before the State Chief Medical Examiner had given these
statements, it had been stated that spent shell casings from
.233-caliber (rifle) bullets were found inside the school.
So all the victims’ wounds were the result of rifle-fire, specifically from “the rifle”, the one we were told in early reports was found in the trunk of a car in the parking lot! This is simply not credible.
Remember that only “the rifle” was used on all the victims. If only this
rifle was used, and if we try to make this claim fit into the
(admittedly fluid) official version of events, then the alleged lone
gunman would have had to leave the school, place the rifle back in his
trunk, then return inside the school and shoot himself. No one reported
any such maneuver on the part of any gunman or gunmen. What we do have,
however, is live emergency services radio feed in which we hear that
two men have been apprehended and are “proned out” AND live video
footage supported by eyewitness testimony showing what appears to be a
THIRD man being arrested by police in the woods.
We can see how the authorities’ hands are tied because they need to fit all the facts into the usual ‘lone gunman’ narrative.
For that, there can only be ONE rifle and a couple of handguns. The
problem is that they have already claimed to find that solitary
Bushmaster rifle in the trunk of a car in the school parking lot, so the
earliest police reports of a cache of long arms being found inside the
school will no longer fit with the lone gunman narrative, especially as
they’re now saying that he had already opened fire as he burst into the
school.
Could “scrawny” 20-year-old Adam Lanza have stormed the school, solo
Rambo-style, while carrying “multiple long arms, including rifles and
shotguns”? Only one person was wounded. Everyone else who was shot was
killed. How could Adam Lanza achieve such deadly accuracy, in such a
short length of recorded time?
Initial reports put the beginning of the shooting in the school
administrators’ office, where someone, reportedly the school principal,
had a confrontation with the gunman(men). We know this because someone
supposedly turned on the school intercom system, alerting the teaching
staff to the loud swearing and commotion in the principal’s office and
probably saving many more children from being gunned down as teachers
took measures to hide the children in closets.
Similarly heavily armed men wearing black combat gear from head to
toe… their job is to kill ‘terrorists’ to keep us safe, which they do by
terrorising us all
One brave teacher, Kaitlin Roig, bundled a bunch of children into a
bathroom and locked the door. What’s interesting about her testimony to
ABC News is that when police arrived and asked her to open the door, she refused, saying that “if
they were really cops, they’d know where to find keys to open the
door.” In addition, she requested that they slide their badges under the
door.
Now, this is generally a smart thing to do in any and all interactions with the police, especially in the U.S. But to have the wherewithal to do so under such traumatic circumstances strongly
suggests that Ms. Roig had logically deduced by that point that
multiple perpetrators were involved, and that they were either
impersonating police officers or were indistinguishable from SWAT team police commandos, either in the way they dressed or the way they behaved upon entering the building. It
also reminds us just how narrow the time window of the actual shooting
was. The shooting appears to have barely ended when men knocked on that
bathroom door and told Ms. Roig they were police.
There are also conflicting reports about how the gunmen entered the
building. We were told initially that they came in through the main
front entrance and proceeded straight to the administrators’/principal’s
offices. But Sandy Hook elementary school has a security system with a
video monitor, which allows staff to screen visitors before buzzing them
in. A “masked gunman dressed in black tactical combat gear” from head
to toe would kinda raise red flags, don’t you think?
Another possible anomaly is
that Victoria Soto, one of the teachers killed at the school, appears
to have had an ‘in memoriam’ Facebook page created in her name four
days before the shooting.
Regarding this alleged ‘LIBOR scandal’ connection between this shooting and the Aurora theater shooting, there is as yet zero evidence to support the claim that either father of Lanza or Holmes
were going to testify to anyone about anything, so for now this must
remain just another rumor. I rather think that this is being spread to
create the impression of a direct link that can be easily refuted, as in
a straw man argument. The obvious and direct link staring everyone in
the face is that the official accounts of these events are hocus-pocus.
The glaring connection between these two shootings, the Sikh Temple
shooting and the Fort Hood shooting is that multiple
gunmen were reported at the time by eyewitnesses, but they are now all
officially claimed to have been carried out by ‘lone gunmen’. This
logically tells us that the real perpetrators are being protected with
cover stories of what really happened because if the truth were known,
some section of the U.S. government would be implicated.
Wade Michael Page, the ‘lone gunman’ in the Sikh Temple shooting in Wisconsin in August this year, was a highly decorated U.S. army psychological operations specialist, according to the Pentagon. But what happened to the three other gunmen seen
by witnesses? It can’t surely be coincidence that Wade was (former?)
military psy-ops. The thought has crossed my mind more than once during
the aftermath of the Connecticut shooting. Others too have suggested
this was a ‘false-flag’ event, or that Lanza was some sort of Manchurian
Candidate.
But maybe there’s a simpler explanation
(albeit more outrageous) than that? Was that really Adam Lanza they
found inside the school? Do we even know for a fact that one of the
gunmen was found dead inside the school? What we have instead are
reports of two or three masked gunmen, apparently all dressed similarly
in black tactical gear from head to toe, being wilfully forgotten about
at best, or protected by the Federal Government at worst. Based on the
authorities’ persistent but futile efforts to connect the Lanzas to this
school, the multiple eyewitness reports of two shooters, the
Connecticut State Medical Examiner’s report that all the victims were
riddled with bullets from a rifle that we’re simultaneously being asked
to believe was in the trunk of a car the whole time, similar reports of
multiple shooters in previous mass shootings in recent years and the
media focusing the emotional outcry onto the hot-button topic of gun
control … I’m left wondering if this was actually the work of some highly trained professional hit team?
Was the massacre at Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut, a psy-op, using what amounts to a ‘death squad’ and a
carefully planned mission to terrorise people on behalf of the
government, in combination with perception management to shape the
narrative and vector the emotional fallout?
Gun control isn’t really the issue here. Control – period – is the issue. The
U.S. government would long since have taken measures, quietly, to limit
the supply of weapons, the 2nd Amendment of the constitution be damned
(it’s “just a goddamned piece of paper“,
remember?), if it was really concerned with limiting civilian access to
weapons. That we’ve seen gun sales increase in the last few days to the
point where Wal-Mart is all out of assault rifles is wholly unsurprising.
The psychopaths in power have absolutely
no compunction about using state terrorism, in this case organising the
deliberate massacre of innocent children, to control people. In
effect, this is little different from what the U.S. government calls
counter-insurgency or counter-terrorism in foreign countries, where it
attacks innocent civilians to create the impression that they were
killed by ‘communists’, ‘terrorists’, ‘insurgents’ or ‘militants’, with
the aim of generating public support for the illusion that the common
people need a strong, ruthless government to protect them from the
‘evil-doers’. When the common people buy into this manipulation, the end
result, as history shows repeatedly, is an overt and brutal police
state.
Protesters against
President-elect Donald Trump gather in an intersection outside the Humphrey
School of Affairs on the campus of the University of Minnesota on November 10,
2016 in Minneapolis. Thousands of people across the country have taken to the
streets in protest in the days following the election of Republican Donald
Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton.
