Americans
welcome only token numbers of people from countries devastated by U.S. wars of
aggression. Donald Trump’s current ban on travelers affects nations that were
already targeted by President Obama, “a perfect example of the continuity of
U.S. imperial policy in the region.” The memo from State Department
“dissenters” contains “not a word of support for world peace, nor a hint of
respect for the national sovereignty of other peoples.”
If Americans Truly Cared About Muslims, They Would Stop Killing
Them by the Millions
by BAR executive editor Glen Ford
“Since 2001, war has been normalized in the U.S.
-- especially war against Muslims.”
In the most dramatic expression of insider opposition to a
sitting administration’s policies in generations, over
1,000 [3] U.S. State Department
employees signed on to a memo protesting President Donald Trump’s temporary
ban on people from seven predominantly Muslim countries setting foot on U.S.
soil. Another recent high point in dissent among the State Department’s 18,000
worldwide employees occurred in June of last year, when 51 diplomats called
for U.S. air strikes [4] against the
Syrian government of President Bashar al Assad.
Neither outburst of dissent was directed against the U.S.
wars and economic sanctions that have killed and displaced millions of people
in the affected countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
Rather, the diplomatic “rebellion” of last summer sought to pressure the Obama
administration to join with Hillary Clinton and her “Big Tent” full of war
hawks to confront Russia in the skies over Syria, while the memo
currently making the rounds of State Department employees claims
to uphold [5] “core American and
constitutional values,” preserve “good will towards Americans” and prevent
“potential damage to the U.S. economy from the loss of revenue from foreign
travelers and students.”
In
neither memo is there a word of support for world peace, nor a hint of respect
for the national sovereignty of other peoples -- which is probably
appropriate, since these are not, and never have been, “core American and
constitutional values.”
“The diplomatic ‘rebellion’ of last summer
sought to pressure the Obama administration to join with Hillary Clinton and
her ‘Big Tent’ full of war hawks to confront Russia in the skies over Syria.”
Ironically,
the State Department “dissent channel” was established during one of those
rare moments in U.S. history when “peace” was popular: 1971, when a defeated
U.S. war machine was very reluctantly winding down support for its puppet
regime in South Vietnam. Back then, lots of Americans, including denizens of
the U.S. government, wanted to take credit for the “peace” that was on the
verge of being won by the Vietnamese, at a cost of at least four million
Southeast Asian dead. But, those days are long gone. Since 2001, war has been
normalized in the U.S. -- especially war against Muslims, which now ranks at
the top of actual “core American values.” Indeed, so much American hatred is
directed at Muslims that Democrats and establishment Republicans must struggle
to keep the Russians in the “hate zone” of the American popular psyche. The
two premiere, officially-sanctioned hatreds are, of course, inter-related,
particularly since the Kremlin stands in the way of a U.S. blitzkrieg in
Syria, wrecking Washington’s decades-long strategy to deploy Islamic jihadists
as foot soldiers of U.S. empire.
The United States has always been a project of
empire-building. George Washington called it a “nascent
empire [6],” Thomas Jefferson bought the
Louisiana Territory from France in pursuit of an “extensive
empire [6],” and the real Alexander
Hamilton [7], contrary to the Broadway
version, considered the U.S. to be the “most interesting empire in the world.”
The colonial outpost of two million white settlers (and half a million African
slaves) severed ties with Britain in order to forge its own, limitless
dominion, to rival the other white European empires of the world. Today, the
U.S. is the Mother of All (Neo)Colonialists, under whose armored skirts are
gathered all the aged, shriveled, junior imperialists of the previous era.
“The United States has always been a project of
empire-building.”
In
order to reconcile the massive contradiction between America’s predatory
nature and its mythical self-image, however, the mega-hyper-empire must
masquerade as its opposite: a benevolent, “exceptional” and “indispensible”
bulwark against global barbarism. Barbarians must, therefore, be invented and
nurtured, as did the U.S. and the Saudis in 1980s Afghanistan with their
creation of the world’s first international jihadist network, for subsequent
deployment against the secular “barbarian” states of Libya and Syria.
In modern American bureaucratese, worrisome barbarian
states are referred to as “countries or areas of concern” -- the language used
to designate the seven nations targeted under the Terrorist Travel
Prevention Act of 2015 [8] signed by
President Obama. President Donald Trump used the existing legislation as the
basis for his executive order banning travelers from those states, while
specifically naming only Syria. Thus, the current abomination is a perfect
example of the continuity of U.S. imperial policy in the region, and
emphatically not something new under the sun (a sun that, as with old
Britannia, never sets on U.S. empire).
The
empire preserves itself, and strives relentlessly to expand, through force of
arms and coercive economic sanctions backed up by the threat of annihilation.
It kills people by the millions, while allowing a tiny fraction of its victims
to seek sanctuary within U.S. borders, based on their individual value to the
empire.
“The mega-hyper-empire must masquerade as its
opposite: a benevolent, “exceptional” and “indispensible” bulwark against
global barbarism.”
Donald Trump’s racist executive order directly affects
about 20,000 people [9], according to the
United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees. President Obama killed an
estimated 50,000 Libyans in 2011, although the U.S. officially does not admit
it snuffed out the life of a single civilian. The First Black President is responsible
for each of the half-million Syrians that have died since he launched his
jihadist-based war against that country, the same year. Total casualties
inflicted on the populations of the seven targeted nations since the U.S.
backed Iraq in its 1980s war against Iran number at least four million -- a
bigger holocaust than the U.S. inflicted on Southeast Asia, two generations
ago -- when the U.S. State Department first established its “dissent channel.”
But,
where is the peace movement? Instead of demanding a halt to the carnage that
creates tidal waves of refugees, self-styled “progressives” join in the
macabre ritual of demonizing the “countries of concern” that have been
targeted for attack, a process that U.S. history has color-coded with racism
and Islamophobia. These imperial citizens then congratulate themselves on
being the world’s one and only “exceptional” people, because they deign to
accept the presence of a tiny portion of the populations the U.S. has mauled.
The
rest of humanity, however, sees the real face of America -- and there will be
a reckoning.
NB Commentary: Let me preface my commentary with these words, yes, my commentary is biased, yes, it may have even been a little bit emotional, and yes, I may have been a little curt if not with a tinge of anger, but sometimes when someone gets on YouTube and provides "disinformation" as if they are an expert on a subject they are talking about... well it just rubs me. It is a particular rub for me in this case as this is a subject that I have explored, studied, understood it pros and cons across cultures, etc. So, jump into this opinion piece with that in mind. Nana is on a roll in this one.
To the narrator of this video, first of all, I do not know where you are getting your facts about the so-called down side of polygamy (polygyny = one man, many wives) and I feel that if you have statistics then you should present them.
Secondly, I am offended by your gross generalization of the so-called backwards African societies that practice polygamy. I am also offended that you think that women are so petty that they have no clue of what it means to build a nation, or that building a nation means having many children. These women are not that naive that they don't realize that nation building will take a long time with just one wife. To these people polygamy is not a matter of how much sex a man can have but how many children a man can help to produce and quite frankly getting pregnant does not require a lot of sex. It is the Western world with its suppression of the naked body that brought down shame on the indigenous people who were quite comfortable with their style of dress. Sexual implications based on what someone had on was not as overt as it has become in western hypocritically puritanical cultures.
If you want to point
out backwardness of polygamous societies, then what about Saudi Arabia, The
United Arab republic, Qatar, Sudan, Iran, India and others. These are
predominately Islamic societies where Polygamy is practiced and they have
booming cultures, technology and educational systems. None of which are
"backwards" as you would define it.
I find your
statement about African societies where polygamy occurs, and defined by you as
backwards, to be quite disingenuous and falling way short of any valid study,
survey or actual living in these cultures that you call backwards. The fact
that you omit the ancient history of African Cultures, the Songhai Empire, the
Mali Empire, the Great Kings and Queens who came out of Africa during ancient
times and from a culture where polygamy was the norm shows the limit of your
knowledge on this topic.
You fail to mention
the impact of the European hypocritical influence on indigenous African culture
and the imposition of hypocritical Western ideologies upon the African
experience. You even fail to mention the irony of these so called Christians
whose early prophets were all polygamous.
Your protestations
are ill-founded even to this day when you do not understand the mechanism of
the customs and culture of the society where polygamy is intrinsic to it. The
in-fighting that you speak of hardly had to do with who was married to whom,
and particularly, since natural selection had more women than men being in the
world, then it is most advantageous for the women to be absorbed into a
household or family unit, rather than having them left out.
And what if the wife
is barren through no fault of her own, should her husband go with out having a
progeny because his only wife cannot bare him children?
In strong societies
where polygamy is the norm, many customs support it and encourage the family unit
to work as a whole. The women and children are seen as resources and they help
to build the community, take care of the children, teach and pass on the
customs. The women are as industrious as the men and have markets, stores,
farms and trading that increases the wealth of the family unit and community.
When many of the wars and strife were started, believe me, it was not over
woman and who had the best looking women or pick of the crop. It was over
resources, land, politics and hegemony. It was the male desire to fight and
conquer his competition which quite frankly, was not another woman but what her
husband had. Wars are socio-economical-political ventures that take place
between warring tribes all over the planet. And it is modern society with its
monogamy that has had the absolute worse wars of aggression against each other
while you, and many others, consider Western society civilized.
I find your entire
video disingenuous, insulting, linear in its presentation, and absent of the
true facts and/or understanding of indigenous cultures and the how and why they
participate in polygamy.
If you believe it is not a viable option for Western men
and women, I have to agree because the culture is not designed to support that
type of marital relationship. Western cultures are selfish, self-centered,
narcissistic and pathological. They have abandoned the extended family for the
nuclear one and have isolated themselves through individualism and personal
ownership, thus creating a cesspool of fear, insecurity, paranoia,
co-dependency and toxic relationships which according to the latest statistics, leads to 50% of marriages end in divorce.
There are a vast
array of issues, concepts, nuances of indigenous cultures that you have
blatantly ignored, therefore your conclusions, based on YOUR FACTS, can only be
skewed and distorted. Western cultures create laws and regulations to manage
their societies thus forcing people into unnatural relationship roles that
sour, end, and foster mental health issues for all involved.
You do have the
right to your opinion, but I think that if you are going to take on a subject
such as polygamy, you either need to do better research or refrain from stating
that cultures who practice it are backwards because that is patently incorrect,
Sir.
ADDENDUM: The most ironic thing of all is that those countries that prohibit multiple spouses will punish the participants with jail time, a fine or both. That is to say, that it is criminal to have more than one spouse in some countries. How is that even a criminal offense? Who are you hurting when all parties agree? Civilization at its finest.
In most of the following examples, polygamy only
refers to polygyny.
Except when polyandry is
explicitly stated, either all kinds of polygamy are forbidden, or the only
allowed form of polygamy is polygyny.
Mayotte: Considered to be de facto
illegal since a referendum sponsored by France in March 2009, forcing the
island to comply with the French laws.[19][20]However, pre-existing Muslim marriages are currently
still valid.
Benin: Benin recognized polygamous
marriages until 2004 when they were constitutionally outlawed. However,
pre-existing marriages are currently still valid in Benin.[21]
Burkina Faso: Both Muslims and non-Muslims can
join in polygamous unions under Burkina Faso law.
Côte d'Ivoire: Akin to the situation in Benin, polygamy and such
marriages were outlawed, though previous marriages are still recognized.[22]
Gabon: Both men and women can join in
polygamous unions with the other gender under Gabonese law, although in
practice only men do.
Ghana: Illegal under civil law,
but recognized under customary law and Sharia law.
Nigeria:
Recognized in all northern sharia states, federal law recognizes polygamous
unions under customary law.
I am not sure which direction I want to take this
rant.
Do I go on about the
current news story and reactions from the so-called World about the
kidnapping of over 200 young ladies sold into slavery or marriage, or
both?
Do
I go on about the self righteous out cry from folks whose backyard has to
be filled with bullshit clutter?
Do
I go on about how this thing has been going on for quite some time and
that it only just hit the news after 3 weeks and the Nigerian Government
had done little or nothing to resolve this issue?
Do
I go on about the so-called Afri-Con logo??
Yeah, maybe I will start here.
Folks, are we too blind to see? What does this symbolize?
Looks like a vagina to me!!! Looks like it is encased in a red oval, looks like them same NWO leaves embracing this red oval, and looks like they are focusing on 4 stars, 4 star nations... I am sure Nigeria is one of them.... then Sudan, which they have already made sure that it was split apart. Libya of course, Man Made River, water resources, gold...
But for sure they are concerned with the whole continent. Where are the African voices against this tyranny? Is the idea to birth a New Era for African Nations, Peoples, Resources, Commodities, Wealth? A New Era of domination by Euro-Western powers (NATO)? This image is scary. Where does it display cooperation between nations. There are 54 nations in Africa.... Or should I say 55 countries in Africa, how do they intend to Command 55 Nations? and draw them into their new womb, web of Command??
How ludicrous, how blatantly arrogant to think that one small country can claim dominion over a whole continent! What if it were reversed and Africa decided to create the United Africa USA Command and put all 50 states and its various land claimed territories around the world.
And the most unfortunate thing about this impetus is the so-called Leader of the Free World, has a Black Face. How utterly disappointing!
Africa has risen in importance to the United States. US tax dollars are pouring into the nations of that continent. The continent is in constant struggle between tribes and religions, with no end in sight. All the while, the US military presence is growing in some places, while others are glaring in the lack of troops. Here is a look at the amount of troops involved in this very unstable continent.
U.S. Africa Command has approximately 2,000 assigned personnel, including military, U.S. federal civilian employees, and U.S. contractor employees. About 1,500 work at the command’s headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany. Others are assigned to AFRICOM units at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida, and RAF Molesworth, England. The command’s programs in Africa are coordinated through Offices of Security Cooperation and Defense Attache Offices in approximately 38 nations. The command also has liaison officers at key African posts, including the African Union, theEconomic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), and the Kofi Annan International Peacekeeping and Training Centre in Ghana.
AFRICOM is part of a diverse interagency team that reflects the talents, expertise, and capabilities within the entire U.S. government. The command has four Senior Foreign Service (SFS) officers in key positions as well as more than 30 personnel from more than 10 U.S. government departments and agencies, including the Departments of State and Homeland Security, and the U.S. Agency for International Development. The most senior is a career State Department official who serves as the deputy to the commander for civil-military engagements. Our interagency partners bring invaluable expertise to help the command ensure its plans and activities complement those of other U.S. government programs and fit within the context of U.S. foreign policy. Read More: Page 2Page 3
News story and reactions from the so-called World about the kidnapping of over 200 young ladies sold into slavery or marriage, or both?
There is so much more to this story than is being told. Corporate media needs another distraction. The spin is nauseating. We can always find reason to point fingers, how many of these heralders are willing to undo the damage their ancestors did to the African when they were colonizing it. How many Africans were kidnapped, raped and murdered? What about the hundreds of years when Africans, male and female, were denied the right to read thru fear of punishment? How many of them became rich families due to slave labor? Where is the outcry? The retribution? The reparations? The acknowledgment that they too are guilty. Not to mention the underlying theme of Destabilization to create a reason for invasion. Be careful. Haven't they learned yet?
The Obama administration is dispatching military officials and hostage negotiators to Nigeria to aid in the recovery efforts of more than 250 girls kidnapped by the militant group Boko Haram, whose leader recently boasted "I will sell them in the market"
Read More: http://time.com/89665/boko-haram-nigeria-girls/
US Army Prepares for Nigeria’s Possible Break-up (2015)
-The article below and related articles raise pertinent questions- 1. Is the United States promoting a breakup, in what’s known as the ’tissue scarcity scare’ scenario, where the suggestion and promotion of a concept leads to its manifestation. Nigerians skeptical about the possibility of a breakup get reassured that best analysis from the US suggests its high possibility of success and parties in favor of this go ahead in full force to make this so-called expert analysis a reality? Or is a natural breakup indeed the reality?
The US has been known to be at the center of important breakups in the past. Countries like Vietnam and Korea had the US play a major skewed role, and when these Nations divided into North and South, the US stationed its troops at the border to defend usually the Southern territory, and the Northern usually became a rejected, isolated rudiment.
In Nigeria the North, currently the power holding block, which is majorly Muslim, and lacks petroleum resources will almost certainly be turned into an Arab aligned, possibly terrorist ‘axis of evil’, Nation. While the US will according to experts defend and instill puppet rule over the resourceful South, which it is believed it will assist in secession if a breakup war occurs.
cover of Newsweek magazine, dated January 11th, 2010
The US will likely favor such a breakup for obvious reasons- the current leader of Nigeria thumped his finger in the US nose, clearly rejecting the installation of US AFRICOM military command in Nigeria. Nigeria’s government has also of recent signed deals with Russia and Iran for major resource, military and power(Nuclear generation) mutual ventures. This alliance possibly does not sit well with the US. In addition, Nigeria has been promoting development, not by serving US interest but by cooperation’s with so-called third world Nations like Brazil........................................................ Read More: http://www.nairaland.com/833643/cia-mossad-divide-nigeria-soon#9845155
Nigerian church at Christmas 2011
Nigeria is reported to be used as a major drug transit and money laundering centre for the proceeds of the CIA drug trade. (CIA Agents & Nigeria.)
The CIA takes a strong interest in NIGERIA
Former Nigerian leader Ibrahim B. Babangida is reported to be a Mossad or CIA agent (CIA Agents & Nigeria.)
"IBB is a Mossad/CIA asset, as was Abiola and Umar Muttalab (father of the crouch bomber and former Chairman of Nigeria's premier bank, First Bank) amongst others like Orji Uzor Kalu.
"Mossad's chief operative in Nigeria is Alon Nelken, an Israeli and owner of Megaplaza shopping mall in Victoria Islands, Lagos.
"In Nigeria, one would find a clear infiltration of foreign bodies posed as foundations and organizatonal institutions all geared toward influencing government policies in the oil and gas sectors." (THE CIA IN NIGERIA)
by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley May 7, 2014
“The last thing Nigeria needs is a foreign military presence to prop up its corrupt government.”
Bring back our girls. The message is a simple one that resonates with millions of people around the world. Those four words were first seen in a now famous twitter hashtag in the aftermath of the kidnapping of 280 teenagers from a school in Chibok, Nigeria on April 14, 2014. The Boko Haram group which is fighting that country’s government admits to holding the girls captive.
Only people who closely follow international news were aware of this situation until last week. It is right that so many people are concerned for the girls’ safety. Unfortunately, the effort to draw attention to this horror is of little use without a deeper understanding of Africa’s political situation.
Because western nations continue to interfere in Africa’s affairs and place compliant “strong men” in power, nearly every government on that continent is weak. Presidents and prime ministers exist only to enrich elites and ensure that valuable resources reach the western capitalist nations. It seems ludicrous that Nigerian president Goodluck Johnathan at first denied that the kidnap had taken place, and then vacillated between claiming that the girls had been recovered or that the number captured was smaller than reported. Hashtags and petitions are a poor substitute for a government whose infrastructure is dedicated to producing and delivering oil to the West but not doing very much for its own citizens....................................... Read More: http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-how-not-%E2%80%9Cbring-back-our-girls%E2%80%9D
People need to get their own house in order before pointing fingers backed with little or no knowledge of what is really happening. Not to mention the resources that are mysteriously missing from this equation.
Self Righteous outcry from folks whose backyard has to be filled with bullshit clutter? Oh and did I mention child prostitution? Real men? Don't buy children, organs, drugs, politicians, land from the indigenous, poor education, toxic chemicals to be sprayed in the air, nuclear weapons, I can't even think about this. There are billions of things that real me should never buy, but it is done daily without a second thought.
Please, we really need to wake the hell up!
Facebook Page
Prosperity Of Black Women (POBW)
May 6
"wow, it's sad when you have more white celebrity men speaking more against this than the black celebrity men, but are we really that surprised??"
Then someone posts this picture of Jamie Fox, yep that certainly fixes that issue.
Folks really need to research stuff before they get on the band wagon. I don't know how many of these pics were photoshopped or how many celebs agreed to be posted with these signs, but for information about where it came from in 2011 check out this article.
The Popdust Files: Ashton Kutcher, Demi Moore, drake, justin timberlake, viral video
It’s noble that celebrity power couple Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore are attempting to use their fame and hypnotic hold on the internet for a worthwhile cause such as raising awareness of child sex slavery. Enlisting some of their more popular friends for a series of ads on the subject, attempting to go viral with the campaign, getting creative with the message—all commendable. But watching through one of their “Real Men Don’t Buy Girls” spots, something just feels wrong about the entire venture. Not immoral, not insensitive, but rather simply misguided, in a very fundamental way.
In case you haven’t seen them yet, the “Real Men Don’t Buy Girls” spots are under-a-minute-long shorts based around male celebrity cameos—including pop stars Drake and Justin Timberlake—which feature them doing goofy, irresponsible things (Drake beats up a robot, Justin shaves with a chainsaw) in order jokingly to demonstrate what “Real Men” do (view robots with distrust and prefer a close shave, respectively). This pronouncement, voiced by an unseen narrator, is then immediately followed by another pronouncement: “Real Men don’t buy girls.”
Read More: http://popdust.com/2011/04/12/why-real-men-dont-buy-girls-just-doesnt-work/
Do I go on about how this thing has been going on for quite some time and that it only just hit the news after 3 weeks and the Nigerian Government had done little or nothing to resolve this issue?
A few years ago, I was listening to NPR, believe it or not, it was my lucky day, and the information that came across the airwaves about Nigeria was daunting to say the least, then a few years before that, the Women protested topless against the Oil Moguls, then another article about how the regulations are next to nil when it comes to how the oil is refined, the toxic waste in the water, the debate over GMO foods, the so-called Goodluck and the cronies gathering the riches into their coffers and leaving the rest to suffer and die in poverty and lack of good educational facilities. The influence of the IMF and WB and the backroom deals that were/are going on. The internal agitation and disposition between so-called warring factions. It was just a matter of time before Nigeria began to tumble. Its support of the toppling of Qaddaffi was key. I have sat among Nigerians and heard them discuss the state of affairs in their beloved country and the corruption of the leadership. My heart cried out for my brothers and sisters in Ghana, especially when they found oil reserves there. The BEAST can only prevail when there is fighting and antagonism amongst the people. "United we stand, divided we fall." Nigeria is falling because it is divided... this issue is just the tip of the iceberg and it demonstrates a deeper problem that has been going on for decades. The Nigerians can call for Global Assistance from NATO (North Atlantic Terrorist Organization) but they obviously are short-sighted and forgetful about what that cry has done to other Nations around the world, and particularly what it has done to Libya!!! Here's an article that you may want to archive...
NewsRescue[Op-ed] In the aftermath of the unfortunate bombings and sporadic attacks that took place in Damaturu the Yobe State capital and environs on the last Sallah Day, the Embassy of the United States in Nigeria hastily put out a public statement declaring that such like bombings should be expected in three well known hospitality establishments in Abuja the nation’s capital.
To discerning observers not only did that score high marks for bad manners as that was hardly what a nation still grieving and coming to terms with its losses expected from a supposedly friendly nation, but that the US embassy was being economical with information on what it actually knew about the incident, and more significantly, the role the US government itself has been playing in the whole gamut of acts of destabilization against Nigeria.
This meme really got me going in more ways than seven. I have always had an issue with the term "real men" or "real women" as opposed to fake ones? I would always ask. Who determines what is real and what is not real and who determines who is more of a man/woman than another? Certainly, the Western man who goes to the gym and eats out three times a week finds himself much more privileged than the man who has to hunt for his food. And women who have gotten their education in the so-called "finest" western institutions of learning feel themselves more "real" than a woman who feeds her family by farming. But more than these examples is the blatant bias and bigotry that these memes convey. Without further details, the picture says it all. We, Eurocentric White Males are "Real" and anything other than what we convey is "not real". And that means all of you out there who are not "privileged" to be a part of our class. We are looking at celebrities, people! We are looking at people who have been bred into one of the most corrupt industries the Western world has to offer. We are looking at people who cover their own guilt and complicity with a sign signaling that they are "better" and more "real" than the rest. They are telling their "fans" who have made them "rich" through their hard work and support, that they are better than them, and the fans don't get it, as they are mesmerized by the very idol, they idolized. Does it really matter how many celebrities carry this sign when these same celebrities give blood diamonds to their to be spouses? Does it matter when these same folks own more things that they could ever use, at the expense of slave labor in some godforsaken land? Does it matter that these celebrities eat at the finest restaurants being served by folks who do not even make minimum wage. Does it matter that these celebrities have enough money to buy all the "fashion models" they want and fill their parties with them. Does it matter that these celebrities have their pick of the finest wines, glasses and drugs that wars have been fought over to satisfy their elitist palates. Does it matter that the core belief that these celebrities were bred on was the superiority of their stock over all of humanity. Does it matter that pedophilia, child porn and child prostitution runs rampant in the Cult of Entertainment. Does it matter that they ate a few opponents on their way to the top? And with that and much more, does it matter that these celebrities carry a sign....... A sign that singularly drenches its carrier in disgusting bigotry!
I say, put down the sign, and clean out your own backyard. Confess your own hypocrisy and move to change the world YOU LIVE IN!
