How the FL Shooting Will Be Used To Bolster War, Usurp Freedom, And Create More Terrorism
by Claire Bernish
After
September 11, 2001, discarding freedom and personal liberties in the name of
security became standard operating procedure following a tragedy, and Friday’s
mass shooting at the airport in Fort Lauderdale has not deviated from the new
Orwellian norm.
Officials
say Esteban Santiago arrived in Florida on a flight from Alaska and proceeded
to the baggage claim area, where he pulled a firearm from his checked bag and
opened fire — killing five people and wounding eight.
“He eventually retrieved a firearm and began
indiscriminately shooting,” Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel told the press Friday. “This cowardly, heinous act
resulted in the deaths of five people.”
While the incident unfolded, before total casualties and
injuries had been counted, corporate media presstitutes championed in live
time increased security measures and tighter strictures on gun laws
— except for TSA agents, whom, some intoned, should now be required to carry
firearms in the performance of their duties.
We have
been conditioned for this. Fustian politicians assume an inept undervaluation
of rights — and a careless lack of vigilance under color of fear — in the minds
of the somnambulant masses will allow the implementation of new rights-crushing
legislation.
On cue, the Wall Street Journal nearly
immediately published an article citing Jeff Price, an aviation security expert and
aviation-management professor at Metropolitan State University of Denver, who —
without a hint of irony — asserted,
I think we can expect to see more of what we’ve
seen every time we have one of these incidents at an airport — better-armed,
better-trained police and a surge in law-enforcement visibility.
Because terrorism. Because mass shootings. Most simply, because guns.
Guns, many pols and gun-control enthusiasts will tell you, create calamity — nothing else — and the Second
Amendment is an antiquated anomaly to be relegated to the already overflowing
dustbin of constitutional rights.
These politicians will further exploit fear of The Next Tragedy to install new checkpoints, more scanners, appended
means to verify identity, and additional TSA agents — already
proven wholly ineffective, if not derelict —
to molest, grope, and harass anyone daring to enter an airport.
Travel, they’ll say, is a dangerous affair — and must be policed
accordingly.
No matter Santiago has been deemed mentally
disturbed — one person, a lone shooter, who
chose a divergent method for enmity — now that someone has undertaken a mass
shooting in this manner, terrorists
paid attention and gleaned fresh plans,
they’ll say.
This
snark is in no way reductive to the abhorrent nature of the indiscriminate
shooting, nor to the mourning which indeed the country must now collectively
experience; but right now is precisely the time for acute attentiveness — not
fear-induced myopia as has become epidemic after such incidents.
A more rational response surprisingly came from one
legislator, Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Greg Steube, who is sponsoring
a bill to eliminate gun-free zones in Florida — a necessary measure now that
the state has experienced three horrific mass shootings.
“My first thoughts and prayers are with the families of the
victims,” Steube said Friday, quoted
byUSA Today. “But this goes back to the fact why I’ve been working
against gun-free zones for the past three years.
Gun-free zones don’t prevent criminals from
breaking the law and killing innocent victims. All that law did was prevent
law-abiding citizens who have a concealed-carry permit from carrying their
firearm in defense of themselves and others.
While Steube’s thinking seems counterintuitive to those on
a crusade to eliminate gun possession for everyone but law enforcement, Chicago
— with
the strictest gun control laws in the nation and more
shooting deaths than New York City and Los Angeles, combined — proves the futility of the notion.
Stricture
and prohibition spark black markets — if someone intends to do harm using a
firearm, they will find it. That applies equally to all mass shooters — whether
mentally unstable, paranoid xenophobe, or religious radical — if guns are the
intended tool for an attack, oppressive gun laws only stop law-abiding
civilians from killing whatever malicious wingnut next begins shooting random
people in a crowd.
Tightening the reins on suffocating security procedures and positioning additional law enforcement officers in airports also
won’t stop criminals of any motivation from discerning a creative method to
thwart remaining deficiencies. These repeated clamp-downs only restrict our
ability to travel freely — they aren’t preventing the next attack or quashing
terrorism as politicians claim.
Fear is
a potent manipulator — and the government counts on pulling the blindfold of
dread over everyone’s eyes in the wake of catastrophe to erase yet another
protected freedom from the Bill of Rights.
This
time, don’t let it happen — don’t be fooled into obliging lawmakers whose only
motive is to use death as a Police State weapon against all of us.
Claire Bernish writes for TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first
appeared.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thanks for your comment. Peace, NB